No. 129 Camping the Ball
In the vocabulary of a Massachusetts schoolboy, to “camp” a foot-ball is to kick it, while held between the hands, from one side of the field to the other. In England, country-folk speak of the “camp-game” of ball, of the “camping-ground.” In this amusement there are lines which mark the rear limit of the respective sides, while the ball is placed in the middle, and the object of either party is to drive it, with foot or hand, over the enemy’s line. Similar, in the United States, is the old-fashioned game of foot-ball, in which, to use the expression of the play-ground, two captains “choose up” sides, selecting alternately from those present, and first play is determined by lot.
This description of foot-ball, or the English “camp-game,” will answer very well for a translation of the account which Pollux, writing in Greek in the second century, gave of the “common ball,” or “ball battle,”108 of his day. Almost exactly the same was the ancient Norse game, except that the resemblance to warfare was closer; the players were matched by age, and played against each other in the order of choice. The balls were heavy, sometimes made of horn, so that we read of men killed and wounded in the encounter. In like manner, up to a very recent time, in Lower Germany, villages contended against each other, hurling wooden balls loaded with lead, man against man. Thus the game was really “kemping” (Kemp, a warrior, champion), and the field a kemping-ground.
It was natural that, while the men contended, the boys also should have their mimic sports, in all respects similar; and we read in a Saga how the seven-year-old Egil slew with an axe his antagonist Grim, who had very properly knocked him down for breaking a bat over Grim’s head. In those days such feats were held to presage an honorable career.
The Persians and Turks still practise a different sort of game, which is played on horseback, the riders using a racket to strike with. Five or six horsemen circle about, and strike the ball at each other; if it drops on the ground, a slave picks it up. The ball is heavy, covered with hard leather, and capable of doing serious harm. This game is, in fact, an imitation of warfare, a modification of casting the “jered,” or javelin. The “Arabian Nights” recite how, while the Caliph Haroun Al-Raschid was playing, a spy aimed a ball at him from behind, with the intent of assassination.
The Byzantine court adopted from the East the playing on horseback and the racket, but introduced these into a game resembling the ancient “ball-battle.” The historian Cinnamus describes the Emperor Manuel, in the twelfth century, as fond of this species of polo.
From Eastern custom we get our tennis, while most of our games with bat and ball seem to have come down to us from the ancient North.
The history of the change from actual to imitative warfare, from the latter to a harmless and courtly amusement or to a rustic pastime, from this last again in our own days to a scientific sport, may supply material for serious reflection.