1 See Author’s Ethics of St. Paul
[2] Cf. Murray, Sandbank of Christian Ethics. See also Hegel, Phil. der Religion, vol. ii. p. 210 ff., where the antithesis is finely worked out.
[3] Gen. i. 26; Eccles. vii. 29; Col. iii. 10; James iii. 9.
[4] See Hugh Miller’s Essays, quoted by Murray, op. cit., p. 137.
[5] Cf. W. James, Varieties of Religious Experience, pp. 81-86.
[6] Cf. Goethe’s Faust. See also Nietzsche, Götzendämmerung for trenchant criticism of Rousseau.
[7] Murray, idem.
[8] Max Müller, Fraser, Golden Bough, and others.
[9] Anfänge des Christentums.
[10] Cf. Ottley, Christian Ideas and Ideals, p. 52. ‘Christianity does justice both to man’s inherent instinct that he has been made for God, and to his sense of unworthiness and incapacity.’
[11] Pensées, part ii. art. 1.
[12] Emerson.
[13] Ed. Caird, Critical Philosophy of Kant, p. 35.
[14] See Author’s Ethics of St. Paul.
[15] Ottley, idem, p. 55.
[16] Luke xxi. 19.
[17] Cf. John Caird, Introd. to the Philosophy of Religion.
[18] Cf. Wm. James’s Pragmatism and A Pluralistic World.
[19] Idem, p. 201.
[20] Cf. Bosanquet, The Principles of Individuality and Value.
[21] Bergson, Evol. Creat., p. 174 f.
[22] Cf. E. Caird, Kant, vol. ii. pp. 530 and 535.
[23] Evol. Creat., p. 159.
[24] Hib. Jour., July 1911.
[25] Some sentences in the above are borrowed from the writer’s Ethics of St. Paul.