Chapter XI Hour of His Nation’s Peril
NEGRO’S PATRIOTIC ATTITUDE—SELECTIVE DRAFT IN EFFECT—FEATURES AND RESULTS—BOLD RELIANCE ON FAITH IN A PEOPLE—NO COLOR LINE DRAWN—DISTRIBUTION OF REGISTRANTS BY STATES—NEGRO AND WHITE REGISTRATIONS COMPARED—NEGRO PERCENTAGES HIGHER—CLAIMED FEWER EXEMPTIONS—INDUCTIONS BY STATES—BETTER PHYSICALLY THAN WHITES—TABLES, FACTS AND FIGURES.
As stated in a previous chapter, the Negro’s real opportunity to show his patriotic attitude did not come until the passage of the compulsory service law; selective draft, was the name attached to it later and by which it was generally known.
On May 18, 1917, the day the law was enacted by congress, no advocate of preparedness could with confidence have forecasted the success of it. There were many who feared the total failure of it. The history of the United States disclosed a popular adherence to the principle of voluntary enlistment, if not a repudiation of the principle of selection or compulsory military service.
It was to be expected that many people would look upon the law as highly experimental; as an act that, if it did not produce grave disorders in the country, would fall short of the results for which it was intended. It was fortunate for the country at this time, that the military establishment possessed in the person of General Crowder, one who had made a special study of selective drafts and other forms of compulsory service, not alone in this country, but throughout the nations of the world and back to the beginning of recorded history. He had become as familiar with all phases of it as though it had been a personal hobby and lifetime pursuit.
The law was extremely plain and permitted of no guessing or legal quibbling over its terms. It boldly recited the military obligations of citizenship. It vested the president with the most complete power of prescribing regulations calculated to strike a balance between the industrial, agricultural and economic needs of the nation on the one hand and the military need on the other.
Within 18 days between May 18, when the law was approved, and June 5, the day the president had fixed as registration day, a great, administrative machine was built. Practically the entire male citizenship of the United States within the age limits fixed by law, twenty-one to thirty years inclusive, presented itself at the 4,000 enrollment booths with a registered result of nearly 10,000,000 names. The project had been so systematized that within 48 hours almost complete registration returns had been assembled by telegraph in Washington.
The order in which the ten-million registrants were to be called was accomplished on July 20 by a great central lottery in Washington.
The boards proceeded promptly to call, to examine physically and to consider claims for exemption of over one and one half million men, a sufficient number to fill the first national quota of 687,000. Thus in less than three and one-half months the nation had accepted and vigorously executed a compulsory service law.
On June 5, 1918, 753,834 men were added to the rolls. On August 24, 1918, that number was increased by 159,161; finally on September 12, 1918, under the provision of the act of August 31,1918, 13,228,762 were added to the lists of those available for military service, which, including interim and other accessions, amounted to a grand total of 24,234,021 enrolled and subject to the terms of the Selective Service law. This tremendous exhibition of man power struck terror to the heart of the Hun and hastened him to, if possible, deliver a telling blow against the Allies before the wonderful strength and resources of the American nation could be brought to bear against him.
Commenting on the facility with which the selective draft was put into effect, the report of the Provost Marshall General stated in part:
“The expedition and smoothness with which the law was executed emphasized the remarkable flexibility, adaptability and efficiency of our system of government and the devotion of our people. Here was a gigantic project in which success was staked not on reliance in the efficiency of a man, or an hierarchy of men, or, primarily, on a system. Here was a bold reliance on faith in a people. Most exacting duties were laid with perfect confidence on the officials of every locality in the nation, from the governors of states to the registrars of elections, and upon private citizens of every condition, from men foremost in the industrial and political life of the nation to those who had never before been called upon to participate in the functions of government. By all administrative tokens, the accomplishment of their task was magic.”
No distinction regarding color or race was made in the selective draft law, except so far as non-citizen Indians were exempt from the draft. But the organization of the army placed Negro soldiers in separate units; and the several calls for mobilization, were, therefore, affected by this circumstance, in that no calls could be issued for Negro registrants until the organizations were ready for them. Figures of total registration given previously in this chapter include interim accessions and some that automatically went on the rolls after September 12, 1918. Inasmuch as the tables prepared by the Provost Marshall General’s department deal only with those placed on the rolls on regular registration days and do not include the accessions mentioned, comparisons which follow will be based on those tables. They show the total registration as 23,779,997, of which 21,489,470 were white and 2,290,527 were black. Following is a table showing the distribution of colored and white registrants by states:
| Colored | ||
| Total registrants | ||
| Colored June 5, 1917 Colored Total | ||
| and white Colored registrants colored | ||
| registrants. to Sept 11, Sept 12, registrants. | ||
| 1918. 1918. | ||
| United States | 23,779,097 1,078,331 1,212,196 2,290,527 | |
| Alabama | 444,692 81,963 81,410 163,373 | |
| Arizona | 93,078 295 680 975 | |
| Arkansas | 365,754 51,176 53,659 104,835 | |
| California | 787,676 3,308 6,404 9,712 | |
| Colorado | 215,178 1,103 1,867 2,970 | |
| Connecticut | 373,676 3,524 4,659 8,183 | |
| Delaware | 55,215 3,798 4,448 8,246 | |
| District of Columbia | 89,808 11,045 15,433 26,478 | |
| Florida | 208,931 39,013 43,019 82,032 | |
| Georgia | 549,020 112,593 108,183 220,781 | |
| Idaho | 103,740 254 255 509 | |
| Illinois | 1,571,717 21,816 35,597 57,413 | |
| Indiana | 639,431 11,289 16,549 27,838 | |
| Iowa | 523,957 2,959 3,022 5,981 | |
| Kansas | 381,315 5,575 7,448 13,023 | |
| Kentucky | 486,599 25,850 30,182 56,032 | |
| Louisiana | 391,654 76,223 82,256 158,479 | |
| Maine | 159,350 163 179 342 | |
| Maryland | 313,255 26,435 32,736 59,171 | |
| Massachusetts | 884,030 6,044 8,056 14,100 | |
| Michigan | 871,410 6,979 8,950 15,929 | |
| Minnesota | 540,003 1,541 1,809 3,350 | |
| Mississippi | 344,506 81,548 91,534 173,082 | |
| Missouri | 764,428 22,796 31,524 54,320 | |
| Montana | 196,999 320 494 814 | |
| Nebraska | 286,147 1,614 2,417 4,031 | |
| Nevada | 29,465 69 112 172 | |
| New Hampshire | 95,035 77 98 175 | |
| New Jersey | 761,238 14,056 19,340 33,396 | |
| New Mexico | 80,158 235 350 595 | |
| New York | 2,503,290 25,974 35,299 61,273 | |
| North Carolina | 480,901 73,357 69,168 142,525 | |
| North Dakota | 159,391 65 165 230 | |
| Ohio | 1,387,830 28,831 35,156 63,987 | |
| Oklahoma | 423,864 14,305 23,253 37,563 | |
| Oregon | 176,010 144 534 678 | |
| Pennsylvania | 2,067,023 39,363 51,111 90,474 | |
| Rhode Island | 134,232 1,573 1,913 3,486 | |
| South Carolina | 307,229 74,265 74,912 149,177 | |
| South Dakota | 142,783 144 171 315 | |
| Tennessee | 474,253 43,735 51,059 94,794 | |
| Texas | 989,571 83,671 82,775 166,446 | |
| Utah | 100,038 169 392 561 | |
| Vermont | 71,464 63 89 152 | |
| Virginia | 464,903 64,358 75,816 140,174 | |
| Washington | 319,337 373 1,353 1,726 | |
| West Virginia | 324,975 13,292 14,652 27,944 | |
| Wisconsin | 584,639 718 1,117 1,835 | |
| Wyoming | 58,700 280 570 850 | |
| White | ||
| registrants White Total | ||
| Percent of June 5, 1917 registrants white | Percent | |
| total to Sept 11 Sept 12, registrants. | of total | |
| registrants. 1918. 1918. | registrants. | |
| United States | 9.83 9,562,515 11,926,955 21,480,470 | 90.37 |
| Alabama | 36.74 124,247 157,072 281,319 | 63.26 |
| Arizona | 1.05 39,884 52,219 92,103 | 98.95 |
| Arkansas | 28.66 117,111 143,808 260,919 | 71.34 |
| California | 1.23 312,994 464,970 777,964 | 98.77 |
| Colorado | 1.38 90,453 121,755 212,208 | 98.62 |
| Connecticut. | 2.19 171,296 194,197 365,493 | 97.81 |
| Delaware | 14.93 20,761 26,208 46,969 | 85.07 |
| District of Columbia | 29.45 25,625 37,795 63,420 | 70.56 |
| Florida | 39.26 55,572 71,327 126,899 | 60.74 |
| Georgia | 40.22 147,604 180,635 328,239 | 59.78 |
| Idaho | 0.49 45,224 58,007 103,231 | 99.51 |
| Illinois | 3.65 685,254 829,050 1,514,304 | 96.35 |
| Indiana | 4.35 272,442 339,151 611,593 | 95.65 |
| Iowa | 1.14 237,744 280,232 517,976 | 98.86 |
| Kansas | 3.41 161,691 206,602 368,293 | 96.59 |
| Kentucky | 11.52 190,060 240,507 430,567 | 88.43 |
| Louisiana | 40.46 103,718 129,467 233,185 | 59.54 |
| Maine | 0.22 67,941 91,067 159,008 | 99.73 |
| Maryland | 18.89 110,066 144,018 254,084 | 81.11 |
| Massachusetts | 1.60 391,654 478,276 869,930 | 93.40 |
| Michigan | 1.83 404,040 451,441 855,481 | 98.17 |
| Minnesota | 0.62 247,750 288,903 538,653 | 99.38 |
| Mississippi | 50.24 75,977 95,447 171,424 | 49.76 |
| Missouri | 7.11 372,106 398,002 710,108 | 92.89 |
| Montana | 0.41 96,753 101,432 198,185 | 99.59 |
| Nebraska | 1.42 130,493 151,623 282,116 | 98.58 |
| Nevada | 0.58 12,581 16,712 29,293 | 99.42 |
| New Hampshire | 0.18 41,617 53,243 94,860 | 99.82 |
| New Jersey | 4.39 18,615 409,225 727,840 | 95.61 |
| New Mexico | 0.74 36,776 42,787 79,563 | 99.26 |
| New York | 2.44 1,092,061 1,349,956 2,442,617 | 97.56 |
| North Carolina | 29.63 155,102 183,274 338,376 | 70.37 |
| North Dakota | 0.15 72,837 85,324 159,161 | 98.85 |
| Ohio | 4.61 588,170 735,673 1,323,843 | 95.39 |
| Oklahoma | 8.86 173,851 212,450 386,301 | 91.15 |
| Oregon | 0.38 69,376 105,956 175,332 | 99.62 |
| Pennsylvania | 4.38 353,106 1,113,443 1,976,549 | 95.62 |
| Rhode Island | 2.59 57,433 73,313 130,746 | 12 |
| South Carolina | 48.56 70,395 87,657 158,052 | 51.44 |
| South Dakota | 0.23 64,896 77,572 142,468 | 99.77 |
| Tennessee | 19.99 169,674 209,785 379,459 | 80.01 |
| Texas | 16.82 376,385 446,740 823,125 | 83.18 |
| Utah | 0.56 45,930 53,547 99,477 | 99.44 |
| Vermont | 0.21 30,819 40,493 71,312 | 99.79 |
| Virginia | 30.15 141,714 183,015 324,727 | 69.85 |
| Washington | 0.54 123,752 193,859 317,611 | 99.46 |
| West Virginia | 8.60 128,852 168,179 297,031 | 91.40 |
| Wisconsin | 0.31 265,501 317,303 582,804 | 99.69 |
| Wyoming | 1.45 24,612 33,238 57,850 | 98.56 |
Results of the classification of December 15, 1917 to September 11, 1918, in respect to colored and white registrants are shown in the following table:
| Colored and white classification compared. Number. | Percent | Percent |
| of total | of | |
| classified. | classified. | |
| Total colored and white registered: | ||
| June 5, 1917, to Sept. 11, 1918 10,640,846 | 100.00 | ----- |
| Total colored registered 1,078,331 | 10.13 | 100.00 |
| Class I 556,917 | ----- | 51.65 |
| Deferred classes 521,414 | ----- | ----- |
| Total white registered 9,562,515 | 89.87 | 100.00 |
| Class I 3,110,659 | ----- | 32.53 |
| Deferred classes 6,451,856 | ----- | ----- |
| Percentage accepted for service on calls before Dec. 15, | 1917 (report | for 1917). |
| Colored ----- | ----- | 36.23 |
| White ----- | ----- | 24.75 |
It will be seen that a much higher percentage of Negroes were accepted for service than of white men. It is true that enlistments which were permitted white men but denied Negroes, depleted the whites eligible to Class 1 to some extent. Probably there were more Negro delinquents in proportion to their numbers in the south than white delinquents. The conditions under which they lived would account for that. Delinquents, under the regulations, were placed in Class 1. Then there is the undoubted fact that the Negro sought and was granted fewer exemptions on the ground of dependency. Many Negroes in the south, where the rate of pay was low, were put in Class 1 on the ground that their allotment and allowances while in the army, would furnish an equivalent support to their dependents. But whatever the reason, the great fact stands out that a much greater percentage of colored were accepted for service than white men. The following table gives the colored and white inductions by states:
| Total colored | Colored | Colored Per | |
| and white | registrants, | Percentage inducted Percent of | |
| registrants, | June 5, | of colored June 5, colored | |
| June 5, 1917, | 1917, to | and white 1917, to registrants. | |
| to Sept. 11, | Sept. 11, | registrants. Nov. 11, | |
| 1918. | 1918. | 1918. | |
| United States | 10,640,846 | 1,078,331 | 10.13 367,710 34.10 |
| Alabama | 206,210 | 81,963 | 39.75 25,874 31.57 |
| Arizona | 40,179 | 295 | .73 77 26.10 |
| Arkansas | 168,287 | 51,176 | 30.4l 17,544 34.28 |
| California | 316,302 | 3,308 | 1.05 919 27.78 |
| Colorado | 91,556 | 1,103 | 1.20 317 28.74 |
| Connecticut | 174,820 | 3,524 | 2.02 941 26.70 |
| Delaware | 24,559 | 3,798 | 15.46 1,365 35.93 |
| District of Columbia | 36,670 | 11,045 | 30.12 4,000 36.22 |
| Florida | 94,585 | 39,013 | 41.25 12,904 33.08 |
| Georgia | 260,197 | 112,593 | 43.27 34,303 30.47 |
| Idaho | 45,478 | 254 | .56 95 37.40 |
| Illinois | 707,070 | 21,816 | 3.09 8,754 40.13 |
| Indiana | 283,731 | 11,289 | 3.98 4,579 40.56 |
| Iowa | 240,703 | 2,959 | 1.23 929 31.40 |
| Kansas | 167,266 | 5,575 | 3.33 2,127 38.15 |
| Kentucky | 215,910 | 25,850 | 11.98 11,320 43.79 |
| Louisiana | 179,941 | 76,223 | 42.36 28,711 37.67 |
| Maine | 68,104 | 163 | .24 50 30.67 |
| Maryland | 136,501 | 26,435 | 19.37 9,212 34.85 |
| Massachusetts | 397,698 | 6,044 | 1.52 1,200 19.85 |
| Michigan | 411,019 | 6,979 | 1.70 2,395 34.32 |
| Minnesota | 249,291 | 1,541 | .62 511 53.16 |
| Mississippi | 157,525 | 81,548 | 51.77 24,066 29.51 |
| Missouri | 334,902 | 22,796 | 6.81 9,219 40.44 |
| Montana | 97,073 | 320 | .33 198 61.87 |
| Nebraska | 132,107 | 1,614 | 1.22 642 39.78 |
| Nevada | 12,640 | 59 | .47 26 44.07 |
| New Hampshire | 41,694 | 77 | .18 27 35.07 |
| New Jersey | 332,671 | 14,056 | 4.23 4,863 34.60 |
| New Mexico | 37,011 | 235 | .63 51 21.70 |
| New York | 1,118,035 | 25,974 | 2.32 6,193 23.84 |
| North Carolina | 228,459 | 73,357 | 32.11 20,082 27.38 |
| North Dakota | 72,902 | 65 | .09 87 ----- |
| Ohio | 617,001 | 28,831 | 4.67 7,861 27.27 |
| Oklahoma | 188,156 | 14,305 | 7.60 5,694 39.80 |
| Oregon | 69,520 | 144 | .21 68 47.22 |
| Pennsylvania | 902,469 | 39,363 | 4.36 15,392 39.10 |
| Rhode Island | 59,006 | 1,573 | 2.67 291 18.50 |
| South Carolina | 144,660 | 74,265 | 51.34 25,798 34.74 |
| South Dakota | 65,040 | 144 | .22 62 43.06 |
| Tennessee | 213,409 | 43,735 | 20.59 17,774 40.64 |
| Texas | 460,056 | 83,671 | 18.19 31,506 37.65 |
| Utah | 46,099 | 169 | .37 77 45.56 |
| Vermont | 30,882 | 63 | .20 22 34.92 |
| Virginia | 206,072 | 64,358 | 31.23 23,541 36.57 |
| Washington | 124,125 | 373 | .30 173 46.38 |
| West Virginia | 142,144 | 13,292 | 9.35 5,492 41.32 |
| Wisconsin | 266,219 | 718 | .27 224 31.20 |
| Wyoming | 24,892 | 280 | 1.12 95 23.93 |
| Alaska | 5 | ||
| Hawaii | |||
| Porto Rico | |||
| White | Percent of | White | |
| registrants, | colored | inductions, Percent | |
| June 5, | and | June 5, of white | |
| 1917, to | white | 1917, to registrants. | |
| Sept. 11, | registrants. | Nov. 11, | |
| 1918. | 1918. | ||
| United States | 9,562,515 | 89.87 | 2,299,157 24.04 |
| Alabama | 124,247 | 60.25 | 33,881 27.27 |
| Arizona | 39,884 | 99.27 | 8,036 20.15 |
| Arkansas | 117,111 | 69.59 | 31,768 27.13 |
| California | 312,994 | 98.95 | 60,148 21.13 |
| Colorado | 90,453 | 98.80 | 22,487 24.86 |
| Connecticut | 171,296 | 97.98 | 31,598 18.45 |
| Delaware | 20,761 | 84.54 | 3,628 17.48 |
| District of Columbia | 25,625 | 69.88 | 5,631 21.97 |
| Florida | 55,572 | 58.75 | 12,012 21.62 |
| Georgia | 147,604 | 56.73 | 32,538 32.04 |
| Idaho | 45,224 | 99.44 | 12,471 27.58 |
| Illinois | 685,254 | 96.91 | 68,729 24.62 |
| Indiana | 272,442 | 96.02 | 65,170 23.92 |
| Iowa | 237,744 | 98.77 | 65,935 27.73 |
| Kansas | 161,691 | 96.67 | 39,778 21.60 |
| Kentucky | 190,060 | 88.02 | 47,010 24.60 |
| Louisiana | 103,718 | 57.64 | 27,494 26.51 |
| Maine | 67,941 | 99.76 | 15,216 22.40 |
| Maryland | 110,066 | 80.63 | 24,655 22.40 |
| Massachusetts | 391,654 | 98.48 | 75,367 19.24 |
| Michigan | 404,040 | 98.30 | 94,085 23.29 |
| Minnesota | 247,750 | 99.38 | 73,169 29.53 |
| Mississippi | 75,977 | 48.23 | 19,296 25.40 |
| Missouri | 312,106 | 93.19 | 83,624 26.79 |
| Montana | 96,753 | 99.67 | 27,142 28.O5 |
| Nebraska | 130,493 | 98.78 | 29,165 22.35 |
| Nevada | 12,581 | 99.53 | 8,138 24.94 |
| New Hampshire | 41,617 | 99.82 | 8,377 20.13 |
| New Jersey | 318,615 | 95.77 | 66,527 20.88 |
| New Mexico | 36,776 | 99.37 | 8,811 23.96 |
| New York | 1,092,061 | 97.68 | 247,396 22.65 |
| North Carolina | 155,102 | 67.89 | 38,359 24.73 |
| North Dakota | 72,837 | 99.91 | 18,508 25.41 |
| Ohio | 568,170 | 95.83 | 130,287 22.15 |
| Oklahoma | 173,851 | 92.40 | 59,247 34.08 |
| Oregon | 69,376 | 99.79 | 16,090 23.19 |
| Pennsylvania | 863,106 | 95.64 | 185,819 21.53 |
| Rhode Island | 57,433 | 97.33 | 10,885 18.95 |
| South Carolina | 70,395 | 48.66 | 18,261 25.94 |
| South Dakota | 64,896 | 99.78 | 21,193 32.66 |
| Tennessee | 169,674 | 79.51 | 42,104 24.81 |
| Texas | 376,385 | 81.81 | 85,889 22.82 |
| Utah | 45,93O | 99.63 | 10,711 23.32 |
| Vermont | 30,819 | 99.80 | 6,607 21.44 |
| Virginia | 141,714 | 68.77 | 34,796 24.55 |
| Washington | 123,752 | 99.70 | 28,513 23.04 |
| West Virginia | 128,852 | 90.65 | 39,863 30.94 |
| Wisconsin | 265,501 | 99.73 | 70,758 26.65 |
| Wyoming | 24,612 | 98.88 | 7,828 31.81 |
| Alaska | 1,957 | ||
| Hawaii | 5,406 | ||
| Porto Rico | 15,734 |
Further light on the question of more Negroes in proportion to their numbers being selected for service than white men, is found in a comparison of the Negroes and whites rejected for physical reasons. The following table gives the figures for the period between December 15, 1917 and September 11, 1918:
| Colored and white physical rejections compared. | Number. | Percent of | Percent of |
| examined | partial | ||
| disqualifications. | |||
| Total, colored and white examined Dec. 15, 1917, | |||
| to Sept. 11, 1918 | 3,208,446 | 100.00 | ----- |
| Group A | 2,259,027 | 70.41 | ----- |
| Disqualified partly or totally | 949,419 | ----- | 100.00 |
| Group B | 88,436 | 2.76 | 9.31 |
| Group C | 339,377 | 10.58 | 35.75 |
| Group D | 521,606 | 16.25 | 54.94 |
| Total, colored examined | 458,838 | 100.00 | ----- |
| Group A | 342,277 | 74.60 | ----- |
| Disqualified partly or totally | 116,561 | ----- | 100.00 |
| Group B | 9,605 | 2.09 | 8.24 |
| Group C | 27,474 | 5.99 | 23.57 |
| Group D | 79,482 | 17.32 | 68.19 |
| Total white examined | 2,749,608 | 100.00 | ----- |
| Group A | 1,916,750 | 69.71 | ----- |
| Disqualified partly or totally | 832,858 | ----- | 100.00 |
| Group B | 78,831 | 2.87 | 9.47 |
| Group C | 311,903 | 11.34 | 37.45 |
| Group D | 442,124 | 16.08 | 53.08 |
The percentage of Negroes unqualifiedly accepted for service, was 74.60% of the number examined; the white men accepted numbered 69.71% of the number examined. The Negroes it will be seen rated about 5% higher physically than the whites. No better refutation could be desired of the charge, having its inspiration in the vanquished, but unrepentant defenders of Negro slavery, mourning about its dead carcass, that the Negro is deteriorating physically, or that the so-called degenerative influences of civilization affect him in greater degree than they do the white man.
← Back to History of the American Negro in the Great World War