Better Gutenberg
Free, beautifully formatted public-domain ebooks
‹Better GutenbergThe Stock-Feeder’s ManualSection IV — Relation Between the Composition of an Animal and That… · 7 of 26Contents›

The Stock-Feeder’s Manual

by Sir Charles Alexander Cameron

7 of 26 · Contents · Download EPUB

Section IV Relation Between the Composition of an Animal and That of Its Food

I have already stated that the results of the admirable investigations of Lawes and Gilbert prove that the non-nitrogenous constituents of the carcasses of oxen, sheep, and pigs exceed in weight their nitrogenous elements. This fact is suggestive of many important questions. What relation is there between the composition of an animal and that of its food? Should an animal whose body contains three times as much fat as lean flesh, be supplied with food containing three times as much fat-formers as flesh-formers? To these questions there is some difficulty in replying. There is a relationship between the composition of the body of an animal and that of its food; but the relationship varies so greatly that it is impossible to determine with any degree of accuracy the quantity of fat-formers which is required to produce a given weight of fat in animals, taken in globo. If, however, we deal with a particular animal placed under certain conditions, it is then possible to ascertain the amount of fat which a given weight of non-plastic food will produce. For the greater part of our knowledge on this point, as on so many others, in the feeding of stock, we are indebted to Lawes and Gilbert. In the case of sheep fed upon fattening food these inquirers found that every 100 lbs. of dry10 non-nitrogenous substances consumed by them produced, on an average, an increase of 10 lbs. in the weight of their fat. In the case of pigs, also, supplied with food, the proportion of non-nitrogenous matters appropriated to the animal’s increase was double that so applied in the bodies of the sheep. As the food supplied to these animals contained but a very small proportion of ready-formed fat, it was inferred that four-fifths of the fat of the increase was derived from the sugar, starch, cellulose, and pectine bodies.

These tables exhibit in a condensed form the results of one of the elaborate series of experiments in relation to this point carried out by Lawes and Gilbert:—

ESTIMATED AMOUNT OF CERTAIN CONSTITUENTS STORED UP IN INCREASE, FOR 100 PARTS OF EACH CONSUMED IN FOOD BY FATTENING SHEEP.
General Particulars of the Experiments.Amount of each Class in
Increase for 100 of the
same consumed in Food.
Breed.A.Duration.Description of Fattening Food.B.C.D.E.
Given in limited quantity.Given ad libitum.
Class I.
wks.dys.
Cotswolds46195Oilcake and clover chaff.Swedish turnips.3·984·4311·69·60
Leicesters40200″″3·153·3912·09·48
Cross-bred wethers40200″″3·243·6011·69·31
Cross-bred ewes40200″″3·253·6011·89·40
Hants Downs40260″″3·404·2810·38·49
Sussex Downs40260″″3·304·1610·38·44
Means3·393·9111·39·12
Class III.—(Series 1.)
Hants Downs5136Oilcake.Swedish turnips.4·164·0111·19·33
5136Oats.″5·737·0710·09·45
5136Clover chaff.″3·987·449·08·49
Means4·626·1710·09·09
Class IV.—(Series 2.)
Hants Downs5191Oilcake.Clover chaff.1·692·206·35·07
5191Linseed.″1·812·326·25·19
5191Barley.″1·752·825·75·00
5191Malt.″1·462·175·34·61
Means1·682·385·94·97
Class V.—(Series 4.)
Hants Downs4100Barley ground.Mangolds.3·805·659·88·91
5100Malt, ground, & malt dust.″4·046·1810·49·49
4100Barley ground and steeped.″3·726·358·98·28
4100Malt, ground and steeped, & malt dust.″2·954·349·38·23
5100Malt, ground, & malt dust.″3·465·469·18·25
Means3·595·609·58·63
Means of all3·274·419·48·06
KEY:A.—No. of Animals.
B.—Mineral matter (ash).11
C.—Nitrogenous compounds (dry).
D.—Non-nitrogenous substance.
E.—Total dry substance.
ESTIMATED AMOUNT OF CERTAIN CONSTITUENTS STORED UP IN INCREASE, FOR 100 OF EACH CONSUMED IN FOOD, BY FATTENING PIGS.
General Particulars of the Experiments.Amount of each Class in
Increase for 100 of the
same consumed in Food.
A.Duration.
(weeks)
Description of Fattening Food.B.C.D.E.F.
Given in limited quantity.Given ad libitum.
The Analysed “Fat Pig.”12
110Mixture of bran 1, bean and lentil-meal 2, and barley-meal 3 parts, ad libitum.2·667·7617·614·9405
Series I.
38None.Bean & lentil-meal.0·684·8825·317·5621
3″Indian-meal.″1·866·3923·717·9477
3″Indian-meal and bran.″0·335·0221·116·1362
3″None.Indian meal.2·099·2820·918·6300
3″Bean and lentil-meal.″0·999·1820·918·4324
3″Bran.″2·3512·1020·318·7300
3″Bean, lentil-meal, and bran.″2·7110·0321·318·5307
3″Bean, lentil-meal, Indian-meal, bran, ad libitum.0·225·6521·116·8362
Means0·747·8221·817·8382
Series II.
38None.Bean & lentil-meal.3·203·1226·518·2801
3″Barley-meal.″0·164·6519·214·7575
3″Bran.″0·163·9921·215·2547
3″Barley-meal and bran.″0·754·5720·115·6514
3″None.Barley-meal.0·5610·0918·516·9574
3″Bean and lentil-meal.″0·536·5721·117·5620
3″Bran.″0·499·7918·916·9506
3″Bean, lentil-meal, and bran.″4·334·4922·718·0578
6″Mixture of bran 1, barley-meal 2, and bean lentil-meal 3 parts, ad libitum.0·275·6520·416·1495
6″Mixture of bran 1, bean lentil-meal 2, barley-meal 3 parts, ad libitum.1·588·1021·117·6515
Means0·596·1021·0 16·7572
Series III.
48Dried Cod Fish.Bran & Indian-meal. (equal parts).1·065·0624·318·1315
4″″Indian-meal.0·268·1625·620·9352
Means0·666·6124·919·5333
Series IV.
310Lentil-meal & bran.Sugar.3·079·3019·416·9
3″″Starch.3·189·3619·416·9
3″″Sugar & starch.4·0610·7817·716·1
3″Lentils, bran, sugar, starch, ad libitum.4·809·9618·716·5
Means3·789·8518·816·6
Means of all0·587·3421·217·3472
KEY:A.—No. of Animals.
B.—Mineral matter (ash).
C.—Nitrogenous compounds (dry).
D.—Non-nitrogenous substance.
E.—Total dry substance.
F.—Fat.

The larger appropriation of the non-nitrogenous constituents of its food by the pig, as compared with the sheep, must not be attributed solely to its greater tendency to fatten, but partly to the far more digestible nature of the food supplied to it.

← Back to The Stock-Feeder’s Manual

Scroll to Top