Better Gutenberg
Free, beautifully formatted public-domain ebooks
‹Better GutenbergSources of the Synoptic GospelsChapter II — The Order of Mark’s Gospel Compared With That of Matth… · 3 of 16Contents›

Sources of the Synoptic Gospels

by Carl S. Patton

3 of 16 · Contents · Download EPUB

Chapter II The Order of Mark’s Gospel Compared With That of Matthew and That of Luke

In the treatment of the framework of the Synoptics, something has been said of the way in which Matthew and Luke treat the order of the material which they have taken from Mark. The subject, however, calls for a more careful analysis.

At the opening of the 3d chapters of Matthew and Luke, these writers begin their use of Marcan material. Thru the story of John the Baptist, the baptism and temptation of Jesus, and his first preaching in Galilee, Matthew and Luke follow Mark’s order, with the trifling exception that Luke has brot forward to his 3d chapter the account of John’s imprisonment, which in Mark is not given till his 6th chapter and in Matthew till his 14th, Matthew’s order here being the same as Mark’s. Luke’s insertion of the genealogy of Jesus between the baptism and the temptation of Jesus does not constitute a deviation from the order, but only an addition to the material, of Mark. In Luke’s 4th chapter (16-30) he brings forward an incident which Mark relates much later (Mk vi, 1-6), the incident also being much worked over by Luke. Matthew, on the contrary, follows Mark in next relating the call of the first disciples; Luke continues his deviation in order by postponing this till later.9

Luke then comes back to Mark’s order (Mk i, 21-38; Lk iv, 31-43), and follows it thru four sections: the incident in the synagogue at Capernaum, the healing of Peter’s wife’s mother, the healings in the evening, and the retirement of Jesus. Of these four sections, Matthew omits the first, presumably because he considers himself to have given, in his Sermon on the Mount, a much fuller account of the effect of Jesus’ preaching than is conveyed by the words of Mark. The second and third of the four sections Matthew postpones till after his Sermon on the Mount. The last one, about the retirement of Jesus, he omits, because he has no place for it, since he has not recorded the preaching at Capernaum and the incident attached to it, out of which the retirement came.

Luke then inserts (v, 1-11) his account of the calling of Peter. He then returns to Mark’s order (Mk i, 40-45; Lk v, 12-16) in the healing of the leper; this incident Matthew has postponed till after his Sermon on the Mount. Matthew again brings forward the account of the storm on the lake and the Gadarene demoniac, which Mark does not relate till his 4th and 5th chapters. But after these deviations he again coincides with Mark and Luke in the healing of the paralytic, the calling of Levi, and the question about fasting. Matthew again forsakes Mark’s order by bringing forward the mission of the twelve to a place much earlier than it occupies in Mark’s narrative. Having done this he falls again into the Marcan order, which Luke has been still following, and relates in the same order with Mark the walk thru the corn and the healing of the withered hand.

Luke has thus far shown few deviations from Mark’s order, Matthew many. These deviations of Matthew’s seem mostly to have been occasioned by his insertion of so much non-Marcan material in his Sermon on the Mount. Luke now makes a slight transposition; he relates with Mark the story of the healings and the crowd, and the calling of the twelve, but in the reverse order; he has thus secured a better introduction to his Sermon on the Level Place (beginning Lk vi, 20). After the conclusion of that sermon, and the inclusion of much non-Marcan material, in Luke; and after the Sermon on the Mount in Matthew, and the insertion by him of much Marcan material which in Mark’s Gospel comes at later points, Matthew and Luke come back to Mark’s order in the Beelzebul controversy. Matthew continues with Mark in the story of the family of Jesus, come to take him home, the parable of the Sower, and the interpretation of that parable. Luke also follows Mark’s order thruout these three sections, tho he has placed all three of them at an earlier point in his Gospel, and has transposed the first section.

Beginning again with the storm on the lake and the Gadarene demoniac, Matthew and Luke follow Mark’s order thru two long sections. Matthew, in copying Mark’s earlier narrative, omitted his healing of the paralytic, his call of Levi (Matthew), and his report of the discussion about fasting, where these occurred in Mark’s 2d chapter. He therefore inserts them here in his 9th chapter. After the insertion of these Matthew comes back to the order of Mark in his story of the daughter of Jairus. Luke, having followed Mark’s order in the earlier narrative where Matthew deviated from it, follows it here uninterruptedly thru the three sections about the storm on the lake, the Gadarene demoniac, and the daughter of Jairus. After omitting Mk vi, 1-6, the story of the rejection at Nazareth, which Luke has given in an expanded form much earlier, Luke again follows Mark’s narrative thru two sections on the sending out of the disciples and the judgment of Herod concerning Jesus. He omits the death of the Baptist, perhaps under the impression that this will be inferred from his leaving him in prison in an earlier chapter, but goes on with Mark again in the account of the return of the disciples and the feeding of the five thousand. Matthew has come back to Mark’s order at Mk vi, 14 (Mt xiv, 1), and follows it without deviation or interruption thru about seventy verses; after which, tho omitting several small sections of Marcan material, and inserting some non-Marcan matter, he continues to follow the Marcan order to Mk ix, 48; thus following Mark’s order, in spite of additions and omissions, thru more than three of Mark’s chapters, without deviation. Luke has fallen out at Mk vi, 45, and takes nothing from Mark again till he reaches Mark’s viii, 27; at which point, without having made any insertion of his own peculiar material, he again takes up Mark’s narrative, and follows it from Mk viii, 27, to Mk ix, 8 (= Lk ix, 18, to ix, 36); then making another omission of a few Marcan verses, he continues to follow Mark up to Mk ix, 40. In spite of Luke’s omission of several brief Marcan sections, and of more than three Marcan chapters at another point, Luke has thus not disturbed the Marcan order from Mk vi, 6, to Mk ix, 40.

Beginning with Mk x, 1, Matthew follows Mark, tho making an insertion of 16 verses, up to Mk xi, 11, at which point he transposes a few verses. Luke has come in at Mk x, 13, and has followed up to Mk x, 34, at which point he makes an omission of ten Marcan verses. Going on with Mark at Mk x, 46, he continues to follow him (tho inserting his story of Zaccheus and his parable of the talents) to Mk xiii, 9, omitting, however, Mark’s story of the cursing of the fig tree and the speech of Jesus attached to this incident in Mark’s Gospel. After the transposition of a few Marcan verses in Mt xxi, 12-13, Matthew also continues Mark’s order, beginning with Mk xi, 20, down to Mk xiii, 9.

From Mk xiii, 9, to xiii, 32, both Matthew and Luke follow Mark’s order. At Mk xiii, 33-37, they come upon a section which Matthew postpones and which Luke has previously inserted. After the insertion of some non-Marcan matter common to Matthew and Luke, and of some matter peculiar to each, both Matthew and Luke go on with the Marcan material, beginning where they left off at Mk xiv, 1. Luke omits Mk xiv, 3-9, because of a duplicate or variant of the passage which he has inserted in his 7th chapter; except for this omission (which does not affect Matthew), the three proceed in the same order down to Mk xiv, 17, where Luke again transposes a few verses, but Matthew follows without deviation. From here on to the end of Mark’s Gospel, Matthew follows practically without deviation, tho adding much matter of his own. Luke makes a transposition of the story of Peter’s denial, and of one or two other items; except for which he also follows Mark’s order substantially as he finds it.

This statement of the relative order of Marcan material in the three Synoptic Gospels has been made in a way to facilitate comparison in the large, and give a general idea of how faithfully Matthew and Luke have followed the order of Mark. For purposes of studying the matter in more detail, Table I is appended. The sections are given and numbered as they occur in Mark, and also as they occur in Matthew and Luke.

TABLE I

Showing Changes Made by Matthew and Luke in the Order of Marcan Material

Subject-Matter of SectionChapter and VerseSec. Nos.
MkLkMtMkLkMt
John the Baptisti, 1-6iii, 1-6iii, 1-6111
His messianic announcementi, 7-8iii, 15-18iii, 11-12222
Baptism of Jesusi, 9-11iii, 21-22iii, 13-17333
Temptation of Jesusi, 12-13iv, 1-13iv, 1-11444
Appearance in Galileei, 14-15iv, 14-15iv, 12-17555
Calling first disciplesi, 16-20v, 1-11iv, 18-226126
In the synagoguei, 21-28iv, 31-37vii, 28-297711
Peter’s wife’s motheri, 29-31iv, 38-39viii, 14-158813
Healings in the eveningi, 32-34iv, 40-41viii, 16-179914
Retirement of Jesusi, 35-38iv, 42-43.........1010..
Preaching tour in Galileei, 39iv, 44iv, 23-2511117
Healing of leperi, 40-45v, 12-16viii, 1-4121312
Healing of paralyticii, 1-12v, 17-26ix, 1-8131417
Calling of Leviii, 13-17v, 27-32ix, 9-13141518
Question of fastingii, 18-22v, 33-39ix, 14-17151619
Walk thru the cornii, 23-28vi, 1-5xii, 1-8161725
The withered handiii, 1-6vi, 6-11xii, 9-14171826
Crowd and healingsiii, 7-12vi, 17-19xii, 15-21182027
Calling of the twelveiii, 13-19vi, 12-16x, 2-4191922
The pharisaic accusationiii, 20-22xi, 14-16xii, 22-24204328
Jesus’ defenseiii, 23-30xi, 17-23xii, 25-37214429
Jesus’ true kindrediii, 31-35viii, 19-21xii, 46-50222830
Parable of the Soweriv, 1-9viii, 4-8xiii, 1-9232331
Purpose of parablesiv, 10-12viii, 9-10xiii, 10-15242432
Interpretation of Soweriv, 13-20viii, 11-15xiii, 18-23252533
Saying about a lightiv, 21viii, 16v, 1526269
Hidden and revealediv, 22viii, 17x, 26272724
Ears to heariv, 23viii, 8; xiv, 35xi, 15; xiii, 9283027
The measureiv, 24vi, 38vii, 2292110
Whoever hasiv, 25vi, 38xiii, 12302232
Seed Growing of Itselfiv, 26-29....................31....
Mustard Seediv, 30-32xiii, 18-19xiii, 31-3232..34
Speaking in parablesiv, 33-34..........xiii, 34-3533..35
Storm on the lakeiv, 35-41viii, 22-25viii, 23-27342915
Gadarene demoniacv, 1-20viii, 26-39viii, 28-34353016
Daughter of Jairus, and
woman with issue of blood
v, 21-43viii, 40-56ix, 18-26363120
Rejection in Nazarethvi, 1-6iv, 16-30xiii, 53-5837636
Sending out disciplesvi, 6-13ix, 1-6ix, 35;383221
x, 9-1123
Judgment of Herod on Jesusvi, 14-16ix, 7-9xiv, 1-2392337
Death of the Baptistvi, 17-29..........xiv, 3-1240..38
Return of disciples and feeding
of five thousand
vi, 30-44ix, 10-17xiv, 13-21413439
Walking on the watervi, 45-52..........xiv, 22-3342..40
Return to Gennesaretvi, 53-56..........xiv, 34-3643..41
About hand-washingvii, 1-23..........xv, 1-2044..42
The Canaanitish womanvii, 24-30..........xv, 21-2845..43
Healing of deaf stammerervii, 31-37....................46....
Feeding of four thousandviii, 1-10..........xv, 32-3947..44
Demand for a signviii, 11-13xi, 29;xvi, 1-4484545
xii, 54-5647
Saying about yeastviii, 14-21xii, 1xvi, 5-12494646
The blind man of Bethsaidaviii, 22-26....................50....
Confession of Peterviii, 27-33ix, 18-22xvi, 13-23513547
Warnings of persecutionsviii, 34-ix, 1ix, 23-27xvi, 24-28523648
The transfigurationix, 2-8ix, 28-36xvii, 1-8533749
Question about Eliasix, 9-13..........xvii, 9-1354..50
The epileptic boyix, 14-29ix, 37-43axvii, 14-21553851
Prediction of sufferingsix, 30-32ix, 43b-45xvii, 22-23563952
Strife about rankix, 33-37ix, 46-48xviii, 1-5574053
The unknown exorcistix, 38-41ix, 49-50..........5841..
About offensesix, 42-48xvii, 1-2xviii, 6-9594954
About saltix, 49-50xiv, 34-35v, 1360488
Marriage and divorcex, 1-12..........xix, 1-1261..55
Blessing the childrenx, 13-16xviii, 15-17xix, 13-15625056
Danger of richesx, 17-31xviii, 18-30xix, 16-30635157
Prediction of woesx, 32-34xviii, 31-34xx, 17-19645258
The request for seatsx, 35-45..........xx, 20-265..59
Healing of Bartimaeusx, 46-52xviii, 35-43xx, 29-34665360
Entry into Jerusalemxi, 1-11xix, 28-38xxi, 1-11675461
Cursing of the fig treexi, 12-14..........xxi, 18-1968..63
Cleansing of the templexi, 15-19xix, 45-48xxi, 12-13695562
About the fig treexi, 20-26..........xxi, 20-2270..64
Question about authorityxi, 27-33xx, 1-8xxi, 23-27715665
Parable of the Vineyardxii, 1-12xx, 9-19xxi, 33-46725766
Question of Phariseesxii, 13-17xx, 20-26xxii, 15-22735867
Question of Saduceesxii, 18-27xx, 27-40xxii, 23-33745968
The great commandmentxii, 28-34x, 25-28xxii, 34-40754269
The Son of Davidxii, 35-37xx, 41-44xxii, 41-46766070
Against the Phariseesxii, 38-40xx, 45-47xxiii, 1-36776171
Prediction about templexiii, 1-4xxi, 5-7xxiv, 1-3786272
Signs of the parousiaxiii, 5-9axxi, 8-11xxiv, 4-8796373
Warnings of troublesxiii, 9b-13xxi, 12-19xxiv, 9-14;806474
x, 17-2121
Anguish in Judaeaxiii, 14-20xxi, 20-24xxiv, 15-22816575
The crisisxiii, 21-23..........xxiv, 23-2582..76
The parousiaxiii, 24-27xxi, 25-28xxiv, 29-31836677
Parable of Fig Treexiii, 28-29xxi, 29-31xxiv, 32-33846778
The “when” of the parousiaxiii, 30-32xxi, 32-33xxiv, 34-36856879
Conclusion of speechxiii, 33-37xxi, 34-36..........8669..
The plot against Jesusxiv, 1-2xxii, 1-2xxvi, 1-5877080
Anointing at Bethanyxiv, 3-9..........xxvi, 6-1388..81
Treachery of Judasxiv, 10-11xxii, 3-6xxvi, 14-16897182
Preparation for Passoverxiv, 12-17xxii, 7-14xxvi, 17-20907283
Prediction of betrayalxiv, 18-21xxii, 21-23xxvi, 21-25917484
Institution of Supperxiv, 22-25xxii, 15-20xxvi, 26-29927385
Prediction of Peter’s fallxiv, 26-31xxii, 31-34xxvi, 30-35937586
In Gethsemanexiv, 32-42xxii, 39-46xxvi, 36-46947687
The arrestxiv, 43-54xxii, 47-55xxvi, 47-58957788
Trial before Sanhedrimxiv, 55-65xxii, 63-71xxvi, 59-68967989
Denial of Peterxiv, 66-72xxii, 56-62xxvi, 69-75977890
Delivery to Pilatexv, 1xxiii, 1xxvii, 1-2988091
Examination before Pilatexv, 2-5xxiii, 2-5xxvii, 11-14998192
The condemnation of Jesusxv, 6-15xxiii, 18-25xxvii, 15-261008293
The mocking of Jesusxv, 16-20..........xxvii, 27-31101..94
The death journeyxv, 21xxiii, 26-32xxvii, 321028395
The crucifixionxv, 22-32xxiii, 33-43xxvii, 33-441038496
The death of Jesusxv, 33-41xxiii, 44-49xxvii, 45-561048597
The burialxv, 42-47xxiii, 50-56xxvii, 57-611058698
The empty gravexvi, 1-8xxiv, 1-12xxviii, 1-101068799

A comparison of the number in the Table which a given section bears respectively in Matthew and Mark or Luke and Mark will show the number and extent of the changes which Matthew and Luke have permitted themselves in their disposition of Marcan material.

DEDUCTIONS FROM THE TABLE

An examination of the preceding table will show how generally both Matthew and Luke have followed the order of Mark.

Of the 87 Marcan sections retained by Luke, only 11 sections (Nos. 6, 12, 21, 22, 23, 42-47) are seriously misplaced. From sec. 35 to the end, the order is particularly well preserved, the only changes being in the placing of 49 before 48, and 74 before 73. Luke’s displacements are usually made in the interest of a better historical or literary sequence; some of them may also be occasioned by his large omissions of Marcan material and his large insertions of peculiar matter.

Matthew has made rather a larger number of changes in the order of his Marcan material; due perhaps to his habit of combining his Marcan and his other matter, and to his wish to present most of his sayings-material in one block (chaps. v-vii). His notable transpositions occur near the beginning of his Gospel, just before or after the insertion of his Sermon on the Mount, and in that section (the sending out of the twelve) where he has made his most obvious conflation of Marcan and other matter. From sec. 37 to the end, however, changes in order are extremely few. The insertion of 8 between 54 and 55 may be only an apparent dislocation, since the saying about salt may here not have been derived from Mark but from Q. The placing of the cleansing of the temple before the cursing of the fig tree (secs. 62, 63) may be due to his wish to bring the cursing of the fig tree into immediate connection with the remarks to which it gave rise; the transposition is an improvement. From here on to the end the sections occur precisely as in Mark, except that 21 is inserted between 74 and 75; apparently owing to the influence of Q. The table will also show that Matthew and Luke practically never concur in forsaking the order of Mark. It also warrants the assertion often made of late years that Matthew is more faithful to the content of Mark, permitting himself fewer omissions, but Luke is more faithful to his order.

← Back to Sources of the Synoptic Gospels

Scroll to Top