Better Gutenberg
Free, beautifully formatted public-domain ebooks
‹Better GutenbergCopyright: Its History and Its LawChronological Table of Laws and Cases, English and American · 7 of 7Contents›

Copyright: Its History and Its Law

by R. R. Bowker

7 of 7 · Contents · Download EPUB

Chronological Table of Laws and Cases, English and American

This table gives in chronological order the statutes, with reference to their place in the statute books, and historical, leading and recent cases with the name of the court, of the judge presiding or giving the opinion, and the reference to the law reports, also an epitome of the point cited in the text, with page reference. It is not intended to cover minor cases, not settling any principle, and where a decision has been reversed on appeal, the case in the lower court may not be given unless some definite point was there settled. The usual law report abbreviations are employed; outside of these, Copinger refers to Copinger’s “Law of Copyright,” Copr. Cas. to the annual summary of copyright cases edited by McGillivray and published by the English Publishers Association, Hamlin Copr. C. & D. to Hamlin’s “Copyright Cases and Decisions, 1891-1903,” published for the American Publishers’ Copyright League, Times to the London Times legal column, and Pub. Week. to the Publishers’ Weekly, of New York. English and American cases can be distinguished by the name of the court, judge or report. Cases are entered alphabetically in the general index with references to the year and to the page of text.

1710Act for the encouragement of learning8 Anne, c. 19
1735Engraving copyright act8 Geo. II, c. 13
1735Eyre v. WalkerChanceryJekyll, M. R.,4 Bur. 2325
“The whole duty of man” protected at common law after statutory term, 24
1739Prohibition of foreign reprints act12 Geo. II, c. 36
1740Gyles v. WilcoxChanceryL. Hardwicke,2 Atk. 141
Condemning reprint “colorably shortened only,” but not “a real and fair abridgment,” 80
1741Pope v. CurlChanceryL. C. Hardwicke,2 Atk. 342
Republication of letters enjoined, 92
1766Engraving copyright act7 Geo. III, c. 38
1769Millar v. TaylorKing’s BenchL. Mansfield,4 Bur. 2303
Thomson’s “Seasons” protected at common law in perpetuity, 25
1774“Newbery’s case”King’s BenchL. C. Apsley,Lofft, 775
Abridgment involving understanding and skill “an allowable and meritorious work,” 80
1774Donaldson v. BecketHouse of Lords2 Bro. P. C. 129
Thomson’s “Seasons”—common law rights abrogated by Statute of Anne, 7, 25, 26, 41
1774Thompson v. StanhopeChanceryLd. Apsley,Amb. 737
Publication prevented of letters, though a gift from author, 92
1775[University] copyright act15 Geo. III, c. 53
1777Prints copyright act17 Geo. III, c. 57
1783U. S. ConstitutionArt. I, § 8
1783-90 State copyright laws
1787Copyright in designs act27 Geo. III, c. 38
1789Copyright in designs act29 Geo. III, c. 19
1790U. S. general copyright act
1794Copyright in designs act34 Geo. III, c. 23
1798Sculpture copyright act38 Geo. III, c. 71
1798Beckford v. HoodKing’s BenchL. Kenyon,7 T. R. 620
Common law remedies also applied in statutory period, 27
1801Act for the further encouragement of learning41 Geo. III, c. 107
1801Cary v. LongmanKing’s BenchL. Kenyon,1 East, 358
New added material to non-copyright book, protectable as such, 76
1802U. S. Supplementary act (engravings, etc.)
1812Morris v. ColmanChanceryL. C. Eldon,18 Vesey, 437
Author under exclusive contract enjoined from furnishing plays elsewhere, 441
1814Sculpture copyright act54 Geo. III, c. 56
1814Amendatory copyright act, for printed books54 Geo. III, c. 156
1817Gale v. LeckieKing’s BenchL. Ellenborough,2 Starkie, 107
Author liable for failure to complete work, 441
1817Southey v. SherwoodChanceryL. Eldon,2 Meriv. 435
No copyright in immoral book. No right to hold what there was no right to sell, 86
1819U. S. act extending jurisdiction of Circuit Courts
1819Clarke v. PriceChanceryL. C. Eldon,2 Wils. C. R. 157
Author cannot be compelled to write, 441
1824Barfield v. NicholsonChanceryV. C. Leach,2 L. J. Ch. 90
Author may not prejudice sale through another book of like subject, 441
1825Abernethy v. HutchinsonChanceryL. C. Eldon,3 L. J. (O. S.)
Ch. 209
Unwritten lecture—oral delivery not publication, 90
1826Mawman v. TeggChanceryL. C. Eldon,2 Russ. 385
“Fair use” defined. Inseparable use of copyright material renders whole work an infringement, 256
1828Clayton v. StoneU. S. C. C.J. Thompson,2 Paine, 382
Copyrightable property not determined by size, form or shape, but by subject-matter, 69
1831U. S. general copyright act
1831Brooke v. ChittyChanceryL. Brougham,2 Cooper (Cottenham), 216
Court cannot restrain book until there is actual printing and publication, 442
1832Archbold v. SweetKing’s BenchC. J. Tenterden,5 Carr. & P. 219
Alterations by publisher not permitted to author’s injury, 443
1833Dramatic copyright act3 & 4 Will. IV, c. 15
1834U. S. supplementary act (assignment)
1834Wheaton v. PetersU. S. Sup. Ct.J. McLean,8 Pet. 591
U. S. Act of 1790 abrogates common law rights after publication, 40, 41; “There is no common law of the U. S.,” 44; exact conformity with statute requisite, 149
1835Lectures copyright act5 & 6 Will. IV, c. 65
1836Prints and engravings copyright act (Ireland)6 & 7 Will. IV, c. 59
1836Copyright act, library deposit copies6 & 7 Will. IV, c. 110
1838International copyright act1 & 2 Vict. c. 59
1839Copyright in designs (fabrics) act2 Vict. c. 13
1839Amendatory copyright act, for designs2 Vict. c. 17
1840Bell v. Locke[N. Y.] ChanceryChan. Walworth,8 Paige, 74
Deceiving public by use of like title is an infringement, 83
1840Dwight v. AppletonU. S. C. C.J. Thompson,1 N. Y. Leg. Obs. 195
Copyright notice in succeeding volumes held unnecessary, 133
1841Folsom v. MarshU. S. Sup. Ct.J. Story,2 Story, 100
Author of letters has sole right to copyright, 92; piracy if another’s labor is substantially appropriated to injurious extent, 252
1841Gibson v. Carruthers Exchequer8 M. & W. 321
Author cannot on bankruptcy of publisher be required to complete work, 452
1841Sweet v. CaterChanceryV. C. Shadwell,5 Jur. 68
Publisher may prevent author from issuing competing edition, 444
1842Copyright act5 & 6 Vict. c. 45
1842Customs act5 & 6 Vict. c. 47
1842Designs copyright act5 & 6 Vict. c. 100
1843Amendatory copyright act, for designs6 & 7 Vict. c. 65
1843Lennie v. PillansScotch Ct. Sess.L. P. Boyle,111 Sc. Rev. R. 2, s. 171
Compilations of non-copyright material showing originality and labor, protected, 81
1844International copyright act7 & 8 Vict. c. 12
1844Act to reduce duties on books and prints7 & 8 Vict. c. 73
1846Amendatory act for duties on books9 & 10 Vict. c. 58
1846U. S. act. Deposit of copies
1847Colonial copyright act10 & 11 Vict. c. 95
1847Story’s Executors v. HolcombeU. S. C. C.J. McLean,4 McLean, 306
Fair abridgment, by ruling precedents, not an invasion of literary property, 81
1848Baker v. TaylorU. S. C. C.J. Betts,2 Blatch. 82
Error of 1847 for 1846 in copyright notice invalidates copyright, 129
1848Russell v. SmithQueen’s BenchL. Denman,12 Q. B. 217
Dramatic rendition of song without costume or scenery adjudged “dramatic piece,” 176, 191; registration of dramatic piece optional in England, 189
1849Albert, Prince, v. StrangeCt. App.V. C. Bruce,2 De G. & Sm. 652
Common law protects until publication, 187; descriptive catalogue and exhibition of copies of unpublished art work infringements, 238
1850Copyright in designs act13 & 14 Vict. c. 104
1851Protection of works. London international exhibition14 Vict. c. 8
1852International copyright act15 & 16 Vict. c. 12
1852Bogue v. HoulstonChanceryV. C. Parker,5 De G. & Sm. 267
Copyright extends to every part of a book, 76
1852Little v. GouldU. S. C. C. App.J. Nelson,2 Blatch. 362
State copyright owner in work of salaried law reporter, 98
1852Pulte v. DerbyU. S. C. C.J. McLean,5 McLean, 328
Publishing contract for “edition,” does not prohibit successive printings, 446
1853Customs consolidation act16 & 17 Vict. c. 107
1853Cox v. CoxChanceryV. C. Wood,11 Hare, 118
Writer may not prevent alterations made by employer, 443
1853Stowe v. ThomasU. S. C. C.J. Grier,2 Wall Jr. 547
No exclusive right of translation under early law, 77
1854Jefferys v. BooseyHouse of Lords4 H. L. C. 815
Definition of the two senses of copyright, 1, 2, 4; non-resident foreigner could not acquire copyright under act of 1710 by first publication in England, 108, 373
1854Stevens v. BenningChanceryV. C. Wood,1 Kay & J. 168
Contract for publication a personal contract not assignable without consent, 444
1855Customs consolidation act.18 & 19 Vict. c. 96
1855U. S. Act. Deposits through mails free
1855Stevens v. BenningCt. App.Lds. J. Bruce & Turner,6 De G. M. & G. 223
Affirming Stevens v. Benning.
1856U. S. supplementary act (dramatic)
1858Amendatory copyright act, for designs21 & 22 Vict. c. 70
1858Reade v. BentleyChanceryV. C. Wood,4 K. & J. 656
Contract for publication a personal contract of “joint adventure” terminable by author if not to publisher’s loss, 434, 444
1859U. S. act. Place of deposit
1860Blackwood v. BrewsterScotch Ct. Sess.23 Sc. Sess. c. 2, s. 142
Reprints to replace destroyed copies do not constitute a new edition, 445
1860Crookes v. PetterRolls Ct.Romilly, M. R.,6 Jur. 1131
Editor’s name not requisite part of title, 445
1860Turner v. RobinsonIrish Ct. Chanc.Smith, M. R.,10 Ir. Ch. R. 121
Exhibition, with restriction as to copying, not publication, 232
1860Turner v. RobinsonCt. App.L. C. Brady,10 Ir. Ch. R. 510
Liability under breach of contract, 232; Academy exhibition considered publication, 232
1861Amendatory copyright act, for designs24 & 25 Vict. c. 73
1861Statute law revision act24 & 25 Vict. c. 101
1861U. S. act. Appeal for copyright cases to Supreme Court
1862Fine arts copyright act25 & 26 Vict. c. 68
1862Boucicault v. FoxU. S. C. CJ. Shipman,5 Blatch. 87
A man’s intellectual productions his own, except under valid agreement with employer, 97
1862Drury v. EwingU. S. C. C.J. Leavitt,1 Bond, 540
Diagram with directions for dress cutting adjudged “book,” 69
1862Howitt v. HallChanceryV. C. Wood,6 L. T. (n. s.) 348
Copies printed within term of contract may be sold after expiration, 445
1862Reade v. ConquestCommon PleasC J. Erle,11 C. B. (n. s.) 478
Dramatization based on novelization, infringement of original play, 172
1863Boucicault v. DelafieldChanceryV. C Wood,1 H. & M. 597
First publication outside British Dominions under int. copr. act, forfeits playright, 184
1863Hotten v. ArthurChanceryV. C. Wood,1 H. & M. 603
Catalogue of old books copyrightable, 73
1863Tinsley v. LacyChanceryV. C Wood,1 H. & M. 747
Printed dramatization enjoined as using substantial parts of novel, 173
1864Low v. RoutledgeChanceryV. C. Kindersley,33 L. J. (n. s.) Ch. 717
Inaccuracy in name of proprietor invalidates copyright entry, 128
1865U. S. supplementary act (photographs)
1867Statute law revision act30 & 31 Vict. c. 59
1867U. S. act. Penalty for failure to deposit
1867Maxwell v. HoggChanceryL. Cairns,2 Ch. D. 307
Belgravia—Title not protectable until associated with a published work, 75, 84, 85
1868Daly v. PalmerU. S. C. C.J. Blatchford,6 Blatch. 256
Test of piracy defined, 175
1868Routledge v. LowHouse of LordsL. R., 3 H. L. 100
Foreigner temporarily resident at first publication may acquire British copyright under act of 1842, 109; first publication probably single requisite for copyright 109, 374
1869Lawrence v. DanaU. S. C. C.J. Clifford,4 Cliff. 1
An abridgment permitted as established by precedent, 81; new notice on new edition protects matter copyright in old edition, 134; “copying is not confined to literal repetition,” 254
1869Taylor v. PillowChanceryV. C. James,L. R. 7 Eq. 418
Proprietor, after assigning copyright, may dispose of unsold copies, 446
1870U. S. consolidation act
1870Black v. MurrayScotch Ct. Sess.L. Inglis,IX Sc. Rev. R. 3, s. 443
New editions “enlarged and improved” copyrightable, 75
1871Stannard v. HarrisonChanceryV. C. Bacon,24 L. T. (n. s.) 570
Right in map drawn to order vests in employer, 239
1872Clark v. BishopExchequerC. B. Kelly,25 L. T. (n. s.) 908
Song dramatically rendered protected as dramatic piece, 176
1872Cobbett v. WoodwardChanceryL. Romilly,L. R. 14 Eq. 407
No copyright in an advertisement, 73
1872Osgood v. AllenU. S. C. C.J. Shepley,1 Holmes, 185
“Our Young Folks”—a title not copyrightable as such, 82, 85
1872Palmer v. DeWittN. Y. Ct. App.J. Allen,47 N. Y. 532
Performance of play not publication, 180
1873U. S. act. Inclusion in Revised Statutes
1874U. S. act. Notice, fees, etc.
1874Isaacs v. DalyN. Y. Sup. Ct.J. Curtis,7 Jones & Sp. 511
Title “Charity” cannot be monopolized, 82, 84
1874Toole v. YoungQueen’s BenchC. J. Cockburn,9 Q. B. 523
Right of dramatization not included under book copyright in England, 172
1874Ward v. BeetonChanceryV. C. Malins,L. R. 19 Eq. 207
Proprietary name may not be used on competing publication, 445
1874Warne v. RoutledgeChanceryJessel, M. R.,L. R. 18 Eq. 497
Right of publishing exclusive fortune of contract only, 445
1875International copyright act38 Vict. c. 12
1875Canada copyright act38 & 39 Vict. c. 53
1875Amendatory copyright act for designs38 & 39 Vict. c. 93
1875Banks v. McDivittU. S. C. C.J. Shipman,13 Blatch. 163
Test of piracy defined, 251
1875Boucicault v. HartU. S. C. C.J. Hunt,13 Blatch. 37
Exact conformity with statute requisite, 149
1875Parkinson v. LaselleU. S. C. C.J. Sawyer,3 Sawyer, 330
Exact conformity with statute requisite, 149
1876Customs law consolidation act39 & 40 Vict. c. 36
1876Boucicault v. ChattertonChanceryJ. James,5 Ch. D. 267
Previous performance of “Shaughraun” in N. Y. forfeited playright, 184
1876Chatterton v. CaveCt. App.C. J. Cockburn,46 L. J. (n. s.) C. L. 97
Rival dramatization, utilizing not substantial added scenes, permitted, 174
1878Chatterton v. CaveHouse of Lords3 A. C. 483
Following decision of lower court.
1878Weldon v. DicksChanceryV. C. Malins,10 Ch. D. 247
Title “Trial and Triumph” protected as virtually trade-mark, 83
1879U. S. act. Transmission through mails
1879Hole v. BradburyChanceryJ. Fry,12 Ch. D. 886
Authors entitled to resume rights succeeding publishers, 445
1879Kelly v. BylesChanceryV. C. Bacon,13 Ch. D. 682
Title “Post Office directory” not copyrightable. No resemblance of publications, 83
1880Putnam v. PollardN. Y. Sup. Ct.J. Beach,N. Y. Daily Reg. O. 13 ’80
State common law superseded by U. S. statute, 40
1881Dicks v. YatesChanceryV. C. Bacon,18 Ch. D. 76
“Splendid misery”—title thrice used, common property, not protectable, 83
1882Copyright (musical compositions) act45 & 46 Vict. c. 40
1882U. S. act. Position of notice
1882Cable v. MarksChanceryV. C. Bacon,47 L. T. (n. s.) 432
Shadow-trick perforated card, not copyrightable, 242
1882Chappell v. BooseyChanceryJ. North,21 Ch. D. 232
Publication as book before performance does not preclude performing rights, 183, 184
1882Maple v. Junior Army & Navy StoresCt. App.J. Jessel,21 Ch. D. 369
Illustrated advertising catalogue protected, 73
1883Patents, designs, and trade marks act46 & 47 Vict. c. 57
1883Clemens v. BelfordU. S. C. C.J. Blodgett,14 F. R. 728
Right to publish involves right to state authorship, 98
1883Thomas v. LennonU. S. C. C.J. Lowell,14 F. R. 849
Unpublished oratorio infringed by orchestral score from non-copyright piano arrangement, 187
1884Burrow-Giles Lith. Co. v. SaronyU. S. Sup. Ct.J. Miller,111 U. S. 53
“Writings” construed to cover photographs, 67, 240; N. Sarony (for Napoleon Sarony) sufficing as name, 129
1884Estes v. WilliamsU. S. C. C.J. Wheeler,21 F. R. 189
“Chatterbox”—title restrained from use on juveniles of like general character, 83
1884Duck v. BatesCt. App.Brett, M. R.,13 Q. B. 843
Amateur performance not for profit not a public representation, 186
1884Nicols v. PitmanChanceryJ. Kay,26 Ch. D. 374
Indirect copying by shorthand characters an infringement, 254
1886International copyright act49 & 50 Vict. c. 33
1886Aronson v. FleckensteinU. S. C. C.J. Blodgett,28 F. R. 75
Title of drama protected under common law, 192
1886Harper v. ShoppellU. S. C. C.J. Wallace,23 Blatch. 431
Unprinted electrotype did not infringe copyright, 235
1886Holloway v. BradleyU. S. C. C.J. Butler,Pub. Week. 30:223
Publisher may affix material to copyright book, 100
1886Monaghan v. TaylorQueen’s BenchL. C. J. Coleridge,2 T. L. R. 685
Proprietor of music hall liable for infringement by singer, 193
1887Estes v. WorthingtonU. S. C. C.J. Shipman,31 F. R. 154
Title “Chatterbox” protected as trade-mark against simulating publication of differing contents, 84, 261
1887Harper v. Franklin Sq. Lib. Co.U. S. C. C.J. Waite,Pub. Week. 31:372
Trade-mark rights in name “Franklin Square library” protected, 262
1888Copyright (musical compositions) act51 & 52 Vict. c. 17
1888Patents, designs and trade marks act51 & 52 Vict. c. 50
1888Callaghan v. MyersU. S. Sup. Ct.J. Blatchford,128 U. S. 617
1866 for 1867 does not invalidate copyright notice, 130
1888Gottsberger v. EstesU. S. C. C.J. Colt,33 F. R. 381
Publication before deposit voided copyright (under old law), 136
1888Mitchell & Miller v. White & AllenN. Y. Sup. Ct.Pub. Week. 34:586
“Life”—misleading use of title enjoined, 84
1888Munro v. BeadleN. Y. Sup. Ct.J. Ingraham,18 St. R. 278
“Sleuth” as a dictionary word not protectable, 262
1888Munro v. SmithN. Y. Sup. Ct.J. O’Brien,18 St. R. 279
Use of name “Sleuth” when misleading the public actionable, 262
1888Schumacher v. WogramU. S. C. C.J. Wallace,35 F. R. 210
Copyright probably voided by too early date in notice, 130; picture intended for cigar label not copyrightable, but trade-mark, 237
1888Warne v. SeebohmChanceryJ. Stirling,39 Ch. D. 73
Dramatization quoting beyond fair use infringement of novel, 173
1889Revenue act52 & 53 Vict. c. 42
1889Beere v. EllisQueen’s BenchB. Pollock,5 T. L. R. 330
Rival dramatization enjoined, because added features were infringed, 173
1889Cate v. DevonChanceryJ. North,40 Ch. D. 500
Indirect copying from newspaper reprint held infringement, 254
1889Everson v. YoungD. C. Sup. Ct.J. Cole,26 W. L. R. 546
Blank book not copyrightable, 72; librarian of Congress not discretionary officer, 72, 96
1889Gilmore v. AndersonU. S. C. C.J. Wheeler,38 F. R. 846
Common use of non-copyright material or work on same subject not infringement, 255
1890Munro v. BeadleN. Y. App. Div.J. Macomber,55 Hun 312
“Sleuth” properly subject of trade-mark, 262
1890Munro v. SmithU. S. C. C.J. Shipman,42 F. R. 266
Illustration picturing “Old Sleuth” not infringement, 262
1890Schlesinger v. BedfordChanceryJ. Kekewich,63 L. T. (n. s.) 762
Independent and “essentially different” dramatization permitted despite author’s own dramatization, 173
1890Schlesinger v. TurnerChanceryJ. Kekewich,63 L. T. (n. s.) 764
Plays substantially similar an infringement, 173
1891U. S. amendatory (inter. copr.) act
1891Munro v. TouseyN. Y. Ct. App.J. Gray,129 N. Y. 38
Name “Sleuth” not protectable, 262
1891Black v. EhrichU. S. C. C.J. Wallace,44 F. R. 793
Title “Encyclopædia Britannica” not protected when public is not misled, 261
1891Dodd v. SmithPenn. Sup. Ct.Per curiam,144 Pa. St. 340
Underselling by rebinds of paper-covered edition not enjoinable, 263
1891Falk v. Brett Lith. Co.U. S. C. C.J. Wheeler,48 F. R. 678
Posing for photograph justifies copyright by photographer.—Reversed lithograph infringement, 241
1891Falk v. GastU. S. C. C.J. Coxe,48 F. R. 262
Copyright not forfeited by omission of notice on remounting of photographs by another than proprietor, 236; posing for photograph justifies copyright by photographer, 241
1891Fishburn v. HollingsheadChanceryJ. Stirling,[1891] 2 Ch. 371
Registration and deposit requisite except under International copyright act, 313
1892Duck v. MayenQueen’s BenchJ. Day,8 T. L. R. 339
Limitation of specific license for drama enforced, 190
1892Fishel v. LueckelU. S. C. C.J. Townsend,53 F. R. 499
Appropriation of part of a work an infringement, 244
1892Fuller v. BemisU. S. C. C.J. Lacombe,50 F. R. 926
Skirt dance not a dramatic composition, 177
1892Lamb v. EvansCt. App.L. J. Lindley,[1893], 1 Ch. 218
Copyright in sheet of advertisements upheld, 74
1892Lee v. GibbingsChanceryJ. Kekewich,8 T. L. R. 773
Injury to author’s repute question of libel not of copyright, 274
1892Lucas v. WilliamsCt. App.L. Esher,L. R. [1892] 2 Q. B. 113
Photograph of engraving infringes original painting, 243, 274
1892Walter v. SteinkopffChanceryJ. North,[1892] 3 Ch. 489
Copyright in form of news protectable, 89, 259. Copying two-fifths of newspaper article, “unfair use,” 259
1892Daly v. WebsterU. S. C. C. App.J. Lacombe,56 F. R. 483
Infringement by single situation from dramatic work, 191; change of sub-title after copyrighting immaterial, 192
1893U. S. enabling act (deposit)
1893Black v. AllenU. S. C. C.J. Townsend,56 F. R. 764
Inclusion of copyright material in non-copyright work does not vitiate copyright, 261; copyright may be transferred to foreign owner, 261; variation from registered title on use in cyclopædia immaterial, 261
1893Falk v. DonaldsonU. S. C. C.J. Townsend,57 F. R. 32
Differences in lithographic reproduction of photograph not a defense, 244
1893Falk v. GastU. S. C. C. App.J. Shipman,54 F. R. 890
Miniature samples not a publication of picture. Affirming Falk v. Gast, 235
1893Falk v. HeffronU. S. C. C.J. Wheeler,56 F. R. 299
“Sheets” defined—copyright law must be strictly construed as to forfeiture and penalties, 271
1893French v. Day et al.Queen’s BenchJ. Kennedy,9 T. L. R. 548
Proprietor, not manager, of theatre responsible defendant, 193
1893Hanfstaengl v. HollowayQueen’s BenchJ. Charles,[1893] 2 Q. B. 1
Registration and deposit not requisite, 313
1893Macdonald v. National ReviewWest. Co. Ct.Copinger 782
Printers’ proof sent by publisher to author implies acceptance of ms., 442
1893Reichardt v. SapteQueen’s BenchJ. Hawkins,[1893] 2 Q. B. 308
Similar play previously written but later performed cannot be enjoined, 187
1894Drummond v. AltemusU. S. C. C.J. Dallas,60 F. R. 338
Author may restrain under common law imperfect reports of lectures, 264
1894Ellis v. OgdenQueen’s BenchJ. Collins,11 T. L. R. 50
Right in photographs not paid for belongs to photographer, 239
1894French v. KrelingU. S. C. C.J. Hawley,63 F. R. 621
Printing of libretto for sole use of singers not publication, 181
1894Gilbert v. StarChanceryJ. Chitty,11 T. L. R. 4
Newspaper report of play under rehearsal forbidden under common law, 186
1894Hanfstaengl v. American Tobacco Co.Ct. App.L. Esher,[1895] 1 Q. B. 347
Registration and deposit in England not necessary for foreign work, 313
1894Hanfstaengl v. BainesHouse of Lords[1895] A. C. 20
Tableaux not infringement of pictures—“Design” does not cover tableaux, 242
1894Henderson v. TompkinsU. S. C. C.J. Putnam,60 F. R. 758
Literary merit not requisite, 177
1894Press Pub. Co. v. FalkU. S. C. C.J. Wheeler,59 F. R. 324
Proprietorship of gratuitous photograph of actress remains with photographer, 238
1894Social Register Assoc. v. HowardU. S. C. C.J. Green,60 F. R. 270
Similar title enjoined as unfair competition, 262
1894Springer v. FalkU. S. C. C. App.J. Lacombe,59 F. R. 707
Composite photograph from two copyrighted portraits held an infringement, 244
1894Werckmeister v. SpringerU. S. C. C.J. Townsend,63 F. R. 808
Copyright does not pass with sale of painting, 234; illustration of picture in exhibition catalogue not publication, 234
1894Littleton v. DitsonU. S. C. C.J. Colt,62 F. R. 597
Music sheets excepted from manufacturing provisions, 167
1894West Pub. Co. v. Lawyers’ Pub. Co.U. S. C. C.J. Coxe,64 F. R. 360
Only proved “instances of piracy” in law digest enjoined, 258
1895U. S. act. Government documents not copyrightable
1895U. S. act. Penalties for infringement of photographs, etc.
1895-1905 State dramatic laws
1895Ditson v. LittletonU. S. C. C. App.Per curiam,67 F. R. 905
Affirming Littleton v. Ditson
1895Bolton v. AldinQueen’s BenchJ. Grantham,65 L. J. Q. B. 120
Drawing remade from photograph infringement, 241
1895Chicago Dollar Directory Co. v. Chicago Dir. Co.U. S. C. C. App.J. Baker,65 F. R. 463
Quantity of common errors evidence of infringement in compilation, 257
1895Ellis v. MarshallQueen’s BenchJ. Charles,11 T. L. R. 522
Right in photograph paid for vests in sitter, 239
1895Exchange Tel. Co. v. GregoryQueen’s BenchL. Esher, M. R.,[1896] 1 Q. B. 147
Information furnished to subscribers protected, 89
1895Fuller v. Blackpool Winter Gardens Co.Ct. of App.L. Esher, M. R.,[1895] 2 Q. B. 429
Song in costume but without dramatic action, not dramatic piece, 176
1895Harper v. GanthonyU. S. C. C.J. Lacombe,Hamlin Copr. C. & D. 138
“Trilby”—monologues in costume following plot, a dramatic infringement, 82, 171
1895Harper v. RanousU. S. C. C.J. Lacombe,67 F. R. 904
Right of dramatization of “Trilby” included in copyright of novel, 170
1895Keeler v. Standard Folding Bed Co.U. S. Sup. Ct.J. Shiras,157 U. S. 659
Sale of patented article absolute and complete unless restricted by contract, 54
1895Snow v. MastU. S. C. C.J. Sage,65 F. R. 995
Abbreviation of date (’94 for 1894) in copyright notice permitted, 130
1895Wheeler v. CobbeyU. S. C. C.J. Shiras,70 F. R. 487
Damages dependent on forfeiture, within statutory 2 years, 272
1896Webster v. DalyU. S. Sup. Ct.J. Fuller,163 U. S. 155
Affirming Daly v. Webster
1896Gabriel v. McCabeU. S. C. C.J. Grosscup,74 F. R. 743
License of song for a collection permits use in combination or abridgment of such collection, 82, 256.
1896Griffith v. TowerChanceryJ. Stirling,L. R. [1897] 1 Ch. 21
Publishing agreement not transferable as bankruptcy asset, 451
1896Guggenheim v. LengQueen’s BenchJ. Cave,12 T. L. R. 491
Printing illustration as separate supplement infringement, as outside licensed use, 236
1896Ladd v. OxnardU. S. C. C.J. Putnam,75 F. R. 703
Leasing a book to subscribers is publication, 53
1896Mead v. West Pub. Co.U. S. C. C.J. Lochren,80 F. R. 380
Use from copyright book of non-copyright material not infringement, 257
1896Mott v. ClowU. S. C. C.J. Grosscup,72 F. R. 168
Illustrations in trade catalogue being “mere advertisements” not copyrightable, 237
1896Pierce & Bushnell Co. v. WerckmeisterU. S. C. C. App.J. Colt,72 F. R. 54
Exhibition without copyright notice considered publication, 233
1896Pitt Pitts v. GeorgeCt. App.J. Lindley,[1896] 2 Ch. 866
Importation of foreign edition prohibited under British copyright, 292; “proprietor” means owner of British copyright, 292, (296)
1896Press Pub. Co. v. MonroeU. S. C. C. App.J. Lacombe,73 F. R. 196
Publication without author’s consent does not divest him of any rights, 45; broad interpretation of author’s rights, 48
1896Tree v. Bowkett,ChancerJ. Kekewich,74 L. T. (n. s.) 77
“Trilby”—rival dramatization, copying added scenes enjoined, 174
1897U. S. act. Appointment of Register of Copyrights
1897U. S. act. Penalty for false claim of copyright
1897U. S. act. Unauthorized representation
1897Hoyt v. BatesU. S. C. C.J. Putnam,81 F. R. 641
Ownership of copyright property is question for state courts, 268
1897Morrison v. PettiboneU. S. C. C.J. Seaman,87 F. R. 330
Uncompleted reproductions not exact copies and not forfeitable, 272
1897Osgood v. AloeU. S. C. C.J. Adams,83 F. R. 470
Omission of name vitiates copyright notice though given in imprint, 128
1897West Pub. Co. v. Lawyers’ Pub. Co.U. S. C. C. App.J. Lacombe,79 F. R. 756
Whole law digest enjoined, although only parts were infringements, 258
1898Bolton v. London ExhibitionsQueen’s BenchJ. Mathew,14 T. L. R. 550
Employer, giving to engraver only “general idea,” not party liable for infringement, 240; lithograph outline from copyright picture, though with other details, held infringement, 244; parties ordering poster held not punishable for infringement by lithographer without their knowledge, 253
1898Broder v. Zeno MauvaisU. S. C. C.J. Morrow,88 F. R. 74
Indecent song not copyrightable—melody protected, 86
1898Jewellers’ Merc. Agency v. Jeweller’s Wkly Pub. Co.N. Y. Ct. App.C. J. Parker,155 N. Y. 241
Leasing a book to subscribers is publication, 53
1898Miles v. Amer. News Co.U. S. C. C.J. Lacombe,Hamlin Copr. C. & D. 29
Specific license for limited use of illustrations enforced, 236
1898Mallory v. MackayeU. S. C. C.J. Wheeler,86 F. R. 122
Employer entitled to copyright in dramatic works written under salary, 188
1899Mackaye v. MalloryU. S. C. C. App.J. Wallace,92 F. R. 749
“Modifying” Mallory v. Mackaye, but upholding right of employer
1899Bennett v. CarrU. S. C. C. App.J. Thomas,96 F. R. 213
Copyright invalidated (under old law) by failure to deposit written description of picture, 236
1899Boosey v. WhightCt. App.J. Lindley,[1900] 1 Ch. 122
Perforated music roll not “copy” of sheet music, 208; marginal directions neither music nor literary composition, 208
1899Brady v. DalyU. S. Sup. Ct.J. Peckham,175 U. S. 148
Single situation protected as integral part of drama, 191; damages, not penalty, under copyright statute, 272
1899Daly v. WalrathN. Y. App. Div.J. Bartlett,40 App. Div. 220
Prior printing abroad forfeits American dramatic rights, 181
1899Green v. Irish IndependentIrish Ct. of App.L. J. Fitz-Gibbon,[1899] 1 Ir. Rep. 386
Newspaper liable for infringement, though without knowledge, copyr. illustration printed as advertisement, 236, 253
1899Holmes v. HurstU. S. Sup. Ct.J. Brown,174 U. S. 82
Copyright protects intellectual production of author, not merely the particular form. “Book” not confined to bound volume, 67
1899McDonald v. HearstU. S. C. C.J. De Haven,95 F. R. 656
Employer cannot be held to penal responsibility for act of agent, 271
1899Maxwell v. GoodwinU. S. C. C.J. Seaman,93 F. R. 665
Playright in unpublished work, inherent under common law, 187
1899Murphy v. Christian Press Assoc.N. Y. App. Div.J. Cullen,38 N. Y. App. Div. 426
Decision against restraint of trade not applicable to copyright monopolies, 50
1900U. S. act. Hawaii and Porto Rico protection
1900Bennett v. Boston Traveler Co.U. S. C. C. App.J. Colt,101 F. R. 445
Suit must be brought under general copyright of newspaper, when portion is not specifically copyrighted, 272
1900Dielman v. WhiteU. S. C. C.J. Lowell,102 F. R. 892
Contract with U. S. Govt. failed to reserve copyright on designs, 234
1900Maloney v. FooteU. S. C. C.J. Pardee,101 F. R. 264
No infringement by acts before copyrighting, 274
1900Monarch Bk. Co. v. NeilU. S. C. C.J. Grosscup,Hamlin Copr. C. & D. 30
Copies of copyrighted modifications of non-copyright pictures enjoined, 244
1900Snow v. LairdU. S. C. C. App.J. Woods,98 F. R. 813
Slight alteration on non-copyrighted photograph does not justify copyright, 245
1900Walter v. LaneHouse of Lords[1900] A. C. 539
Reports of Rosebery’s speeches—no literary merit or labor need be shown to secure copyright, 68
1900Falk v. Curtis Pub. Co.U. S. C. C.J. Dallas,100 F. R. 77
“Person” includes partnerships and corporations, 273
1901Falk v. Curtis Pub. Co.U. S. C. C. App.J. Buffington,107 F. R. 126
Suit for penalties cannot precede forfeiture, 273.—Affirming Falk v. Curtis Pub. Co.
1901Child v. N. Y. Times Co.U. S. C. C.J. Hazel,110 F. R. 527
No penalty where copies are not literally “found in possession,” 272
1901Doan, et al. v. Amer. Bk. Co.U. S. C. C. App.J. Jenkins,105 F. R. 772
Rebound second-hand copies no infringement, but must be distinctly marked, 263
1901Marshall v. BullCt. App.L. J. Collins,85 L. T. 77
Illustrations protected as part of book, 238; sale of electrotypes does not transfer copyright, 238
1901Neufeld v. ChapmanKing’s BenchJ. Walton,Times O. 31, ’01
“All copies sold” includes periodical publication, 448
1901Nicholls v. ParkerKing’s BenchJ. Wright,17 T. L. R. 482
Specific license for use of illustration in specified periodical upheld, despite “custom of the trade,” 236
1901Stern v. RoseyD. C. C. App.J. Shepard,17 App. Dist. Col. 562
Mechanical reproduction of copyrighted songs not preventable, 205
1901Trengrouse v. “Sol” SyndicateChanceryC. J. Alverstone,Times S. 26, ’01
Whole work infringement though less than a page pirated, 254
1901Western Union v. Call Pub. Co.U. S. Sup. Ct.J. Brewer,181 U. S. 92
When common law in states is in conflict, U. S. courts will enforce that of England, 44
1901Hegeman v. SpringerU. S. C. C. App.J. Wheeler,110 F. R. 374
Seizure without prior demand authorized, 274
1902Musical (summary proceedings) copyright act2 Edw. VII, c. 15
1902Amer. Press Assoc. v. Daily Story Pub. Co.U. S. C. C. App.J. Jenkins,120 F. R. 766
Innocent copying from reprint lacking copyright notice an infringement, 253
1902Britain v. HanksKing’s BenchJ. Wright,86 L. T. 765
Toy soldiers, artistically modeled, copyrightable as sculpture, 247
1902Fraser v. YackU. S. C. C. App.J. Jenkins,116 F. R. 285
“Little Minister”—Foreigner, prior to 1891, could transfer advance sheets only, not right to copyright, 110
1902Herne v. LieblerN. Y. App. Div.J. Ingraham,73 App. Div. 194
Sub-license under limited lease of unpublished drama prevented under common law, 187
1902Mifflin v. DuttonU. S. Sup. Ct.J. Brown,174 U. S. 82
In joint authorship duplicate copyrights under different names not permissible, 102
1902National Tel. News Co. v. Western UnionU. S. C. C. App.J. Grosscup,119 F. R. 294
News on ticker tape not copyrightable but unfair use enjoinable, 89
1902Patterson v. OgilvieU. S. C. C.J. Lacombe,119 F. R. 451
Variance of sub-title immaterial, 192; damages not barred by limitation as penalties, 273
1903Graves v. GorriePrivy CouncilLd. Lindley,89 L. T. 111
Fine arts copyright act, 1862, does not protect outside United Kingdom, 246
1903Hegeman v. SpringerU. S. Sup. Ct.Per curiam,189 U. S. 505
Affirming Hegeman v. Springer
1903Barnes v. MinerU. S. C. C.J. Ray,122 F. R. 480
Combination of songs, costume and cinematograph not a dramatic composition, 175
1903Bleistein v. DonaldsonU. S. Sup. Ct.J. Holmes,188 U. S. 239
Copyright can be entered in trading name instead of legal name, 102; circus posters protected—“A picture is none the less a subject of copyright that it is used for an advertisement,” 237
1903Bloom v. NixonU. S. C. C.J. McPherson,125 F. R. 977
Parody, including quotation, not infringement, 190
1903Champney v. HaagU. S. C. C.J. McPherson,121 F. R. 944
Photograph from a photograph construed as infringement of photograph, and not of original painting, 243, 274
1903Cleland v. ThayerU. S. C. C. App.J. Caldwell,121 F. R. 71
Original photograph of uncopyrighted or uncopyrightable subject protected, 241
1903Dodge v. Allied ArtsN. Y. Sup. Ct.J. McCall,Hamlin Copr. C. & D. 115
Artist can prevent alterations of paintings done on commission, 245
1903Edison v. LubinU. S. C. C. App.J. Buffington,122 F. R. 240
Entire moving picture film one photograph protected by single notice, 242
1903Frohman v. WeberN. Y. Sup. Ct.J. Clarke,Hamlin Copr. C. & D. 151
Use of names of characters in plays not infringement, 192
1903Kipling v. PutnamU. S. C. C. App.J. Coxe,120 F. R. 631
Changed binding of copyright work permissible, 263; elephant’s head design not distinctive trade-mark, 263; no similarity to constitute unfair competition, 263
1903Lawrence & Bullen v. AflaloHouse of Lords[1904] L. R. App. C. 17
Proprietor of encyclopædia “stood in the shoes” of writers as copyright proprietor, 99
1903Lorimer v. Boston HeraldMass. Sup. Ct.J. Morton,Pub. Week. 63:1386
Burlesqued title in newspaper articles not enjoinable, 264
1903Moore v. EdwardesKing’s BenchL. C. J. Alverstone,Times Mr. 3, ’03
Use of scenario from rejected ms. for unauthorised work punished, 176
1903Nethersole v. BellChanceryJ. Farwell,Times Jl. 4, 31, ’03
Rival dramatisation as modified from other version enjoined, 174
1903Rinehart v. SmithU. S. C. C.J. McPherson,121 F. R. 148
Replevin not the proper form of copyright suit, 273
1903Stone v. Long,King’s BenchMaster Chitty,Copr. Cas. ’01-’04, 66
Publisher responsible for loss of ms. by employee’s negligence, 442
1903Thompson Co. v. Amer. Law Book Co.U. S. C. C. App.J. Coxe,122 F. R. 922
Use of list of cases, made from copyright digest, as guide to reports not infringement, 258; “equity will not protect a pirate from infringements of his piratical work,” 258
1903Victor Talking Mach. Co. v. The FairU. S. C. C. App.J. Baker,123 F. R. 424
Patent as a monopoly, 50
1903Wagner v. ConriedU. S. C. C.J. Lacombe,125 F. R. 798
Previous printing abroad forfeits American playright in music, 181
1903Wright v. EisleN. Y. App. Div.J. Woodward,86 App. Div. 356
Filing of architectural plans in public office constitutes publication, 242
1904U. S. act. Protection of works, Louisiana Purchase Exposition
1904Bisel v. WelshU. S. C. C.J. Holland,131 F. R. 564
Repetition of errors evidence of author’s infringement of his own earlier work, 257
1904Encyclopædia Brittanica Co. v. Tribune Assoc.U. S. C. C.J. Lacombe,Pub. Week. 55:1458
Condensations of copyright articles from cyclopædia enjoined, 261
1904Gannet v. RupertU. S. C. C. App.J. Coxe,Pub. Week. 55:69
“Comfort” as title of periodical protected as common law trade-mark, 84; court should arrest pirate before he makes off with plunder, 274
1904Straus v. Amer. Pub. Assoc.N. Y. Ct. App.C. J. Parker,177 N. Y. 473
Agreements to restrict prices legal on copyright books; contrary to statute on non-copyright books, 57
1905U. S. act. Ad interim protection
1905U. S. trade-mark act
1905Fraser v. EdwardesKing’s BenchJ. Darling,Times Mr. 23-30, ’05
Use of scenario from rejected ms. for unauthorized work punished, 176
1905Harper v. DonohueU. S. C. C.J. Sanborn,144 F. R. 491
Analysis of author’s rights, 47; omission of notice on foreign-made edition does not vitiate Amer. copyright, 133
1905Hills v. HooverU. S. C. C.J. Holland,136 F. R. 701
Additional words in copyright notice harmless superfluity, 128
1905Lucas v. MoncrieffChanceryJ. Warrington,21 T. L. R. 683
Publishing agreement released by bankruptcy of publisher, 443
1905Sampson & Murdock Co. v. Seaver RadfordU. S. C. C. App.J. Putnam,140 F. R. 539
Verification from rival directory beyond fair use, 255
1905Slingsby v. Bradford Co.ChanceryJ. Warrington,[1905] W. N. 122
Copying of fraudulent material not punishable in equity, 258
1906Musical copyright act6 Edw. VII; c. 36
1906U. S. trade-mark act
1906Burk v. JohnsonU. S. C. C. App.J. Adams,146 F. R. 209
Copyright cannot protect schemes or method of doing business, 61
1906Davis v. BenjaminChanceryJ. Eady,L. R. [1906] 2 Ch. 491
Sheet of advertising illustrations held a book, 73
1906Donohue v. HarperU. S. C. C. App.Per curiam,146 F. R. 1023
Affirming decision in Harper v. Donohue
1906Hartford Printing Co. v. Hartford Directory Co.U. S. C. C.J. Platt,146 F. R. 332;
148 F. R. 470
Gross receipts less cost awarded as damages, for wholesale copying, 275
1906Macmillan v. DentCt. App.J. Vaughan,[1907] 1 Ch. 107
Charles Lamb letters—copyright separate from material object, 92
1906Rex v. WilletsCom. Serj.,Times Ja. 20, ’06
Criminal sentences in conspiracy of cheap music pirates, 277
1906Ward, Lock & Co. v. LongChanceryJ. Kekewich,L. R. [1906] 2 Ch. 550
Agreement to write a book assignable after completion of book, 441
1906White-Smith v. ApolloU. S. C. C. App.Per curiam,147 F. R. 226
Perforated roll not copy in fact of staff notation, 204
1906Wooster v. CraneU. S. C. C. App.J. Van Devanter,147 F. R. 515
Author restrained from selling modification of copyright work previously assigned, 442
1907Patents and designs act7 Edw. VII. c. 29
1907American Tobacco Co. v. WerckmeisterU. S. Sup. Ct.J. Day,207 U. S. 284
Exhibition with restriction as to copying, not publication, 232, 235
1907Bracken v. RosenthalU. S. C. C.J. Kohlsaat,151 F. R. 136
Photograph infringes copyright in statuary, 243
1907Dutton v. Cupples & LeonN. Y. App. Div.J. Scott,Pub. Week. 71:630
Imitation of style of series unfair competition, 263
1907Jude’s “Liedertafel” caseCt. App.C. J. Alverstone,L. R. [1907] 1 Ch. 651
Assignment expunged from record, 447
1907Philip v. PennellChanceryJ. Kekewich,L. R. [1907] 2 Ch. 577
Publication permitted of biographical information from receivers of letters, 92
1907Merriam v. OgilvieU. S. C. C.J. Colt,149 F. R. 858
Use of name “Webster” not restrainable except where public is misled, 261
1908Merriam v. OgilvieU. S. C. C. App.J. Aldrich,159 F. R. 638
Affirming Merriam v. Ogilvie
1908White-Smith v. ApolloU. S. Sup. Ct.J. Day,209 U. S. 1
Records not copies or publications of copyright music, 54, 204. Affirming White-Smith v. Apollo
1908Bamforth v. Douglas Post Card Co.U. S. C. C.J. McPherson,158 F. R. 355
Unfair competition not restrainable if copyrightable work is not copyrighted, 264
1908Bobbs-Merrill Co. v. StrausU. S. Sup. Ct.J. Day,210 U. S. 339
Restriction of price not enforceable in connection with copyright notice, 55, 57
1908Clinical Obstetrics, in reChanceryJ. Warrington,Copr. Cas. ’05-’10, 176
“Exclusive right of publication” a license, not assignment, 447; assignment record expunged, 447.
1908Globe Newspaper Co. v. WalkerU. S. Sup. Ct.J. Day,210 U. S. 356
No damages outside statutory protection where no copies were found in possession, 27
1908Jones v. Amer. Law Bk. Co.N. Y. App. Div.J. Houghton,125 App. Div. 519
Denying right of author to have name appended to cyclopædic contribution, 100
1908Karno v. Pathé FrèresKing’s BenchJ. Jelf,99 L. T. 114
Moving pictures not infringement, 177
1908Landa v. GreenbergChanceryJ. Eve,24 T. L. R. 441
Nom de plume of settled use protected outside copyright or trade-mark, 99
1908Mansell v. Valley Printing Co.Ct. App.Cozens-Hardy, M. R.,L. R. [1908] 2 Ch. 441
Common law concurrent with statutory protection of unpublished works, 61
1908Royal Sales Co. v. GaynorU. S. C. C.J. Ward,164 F. R. 207
Monogram not copyrightable, 70
1908Sarpy v. HollandCt. App.Cozens-Hardy, M. R.,L. R. [1908] 2 Ch. 198
Copyright reservation in foreign language sufficing, 313; no formalities requisite under international copyright, 313
1908Scribner v. StrausU. S. Sup. Ct.J. Day,210 U. S. 352
Agreement to restrict prices not proven by notice on bills, etc., 55
1908Share Certificate Book, in reDiv. Ct.J. Bigham,Copr. Cas. ’05-’10, 173
False entry expunged from registry, 150
1908Straus v. American Publishers’ AssociationN. Y. App. Div.J. Gray,127 App. D. 936
Agreements to restrict price legal on copyright books, 57; dissenting opinion, 57
1908Tate v. FullbrookCt. App.L. J. Vaughan Williams,L. R. [1908] 1 K. B. 821
Writer of dialogue sole author of musical sketch in England, 176
1908United Dictionary Co. v. MerriamU. S. Sup. Ct.J. Holmes,208 U. S. 260
Omission of notice on foreign-made edition sold only for use there does not vitiate Amer. copyright, 134
1908Dam v. Kirke La Shelle Co.U. S. C. C.J. Hazel,166 F. R. 589
Reassignment to author of copyright in periodical contribution, 101; right of dramatization included in copyright of story, 171; full profits awarded as damages, 171
1908Harper v. KalemU. S. C. C.J. Lacombe,
Copyright notice in book protects illustrations against moving picture reproduction, 77
1909U. S. Copyright code
1909Banks Law Pub. Co. v. Lawyers Co-operative Pub. Co.U. S. C. C. App.Per curiam,169 F. R. 386
Affirming that arrangement of cases in sequence, pagination, etc., are not protectable details, 259
1909Bong v. Campbell Art Co.U. S. Sup. Ct.J. McKenna,214 U. S. 236
Citizen of an unproclaimed country cannot indirectly obtain American copyright, 110
1909Bosselman v. RichardsonU. S. C. C. App.J. Ward,174 F. R. 622
Copyright claimant other than author must prove his claims, 107
1909Caliga v. Inter-Ocean Newsp. Co.U. S. Sup. Ct.J. Day,215 U. S. 182
Re-copyright on finishing picture invalid, 231
1909Chicago Tribune v. Ill. Printing & Pub. Co.U. S. C. C.J. Grosscup,Pub. Week. 76: 643, 957
Peary letters—copyright in newspaper letter as book upheld, 103
1909N. Y. Times v. Press Pub. Co. et al.U. S. C. C.J. Hand,Pub. Week. 76: 643, 957
Peary letters—agreement for newspaper letters did not authorize copyright as book, 103
1909Consolidated Gas Co.U. S. Sup. Ct.J. Peckham,212 U. S. 19
State has sovereign power to limit prices—in case of public franchise corporation, 207
1909Freeman v. Trade RegisterU. S. C. C.J. Donworth,173 F. R. 419
Copyright notice on editorial page invalid, 131
1909Frohman v. FerrisIll. Sup. Ct.J. Farmer,238 Ill. Rep. 430
Performance of play not publication, 181
1909Glaser v. St. Elmo Co.U. S. C. C.J. Holt,175 F. R. 276
Title of novel, out of copyright, not protectable in drama, 192
1909Green v. LubyU. S. C. C.J. Noyes,177 F. R. 287
Error in classification does not invalidate copyright, 136
1909Harper v. KalemU. S. C. C. App.J. Ward,169 F. R. 61
Moving pictures may infringe book copyright, 176, 242; both speech and action not necessary in dramatic performances, 176; illustrations as such do not infringe book copyright, 237
1909Heinemann v. Smart Set Pub. Co.ChanceryJ. Parker,Times, Jl. 15, ’09
Innocent publisher responsible for acts beyond authority given to literary agent, 437
1909Hervieu v. OgilvieU. S. C. C.J. Martin,169 F. R. 978
Printed drama not subject to manufacturing provisions as “book,” 155, 168
1909Hunter v. CliffordWest. Co. Ct.J. Lush,Times N. 12. ’09
Right to copyright lapsed on work of art sold without registration, 247
1909Karno v. Pathé FrèresCt. App.L. J. Vaughan Williams,100 L. T. 260
Exhibitor, not manufacturer of film, responsible party, 177
1909Saake v. LedererU. S. C. C. App.J. Buffington,174 F. R. 135
License to perform does not imply authority to copyright, 107
1909Scholz v. AmasisCt. App.L. C. J. Farwell,Times My. 19, ’09
Only substantial copying of written dialogue infringes drama in England, 176
1910Dam v. Kirke La Shelle Co.U. S. C. C. App.J. Noyes,175 F. R. 902
Following decision in lower court
1910De Jonge v. Breuker & KesslerU. S. C. C.J. McPherson,182 F. R. 150
Artistic designs for cover paper copyrightable, 237; separable designs must have separate copyright notices, 242; subject cannot be protected both under copyright and trade-mark acts, 237
1910Eliot & Collier v. Jones, et al.N. Y. Sup. Ct.J. Newburger,120 N. Y. Supp. 989
Use of “Dr. Eliot’s five-foot shelf” prohibited as involving deception, 85
1910Ellis v. HurstN. Y. Sup. Ct.J. Greenbaum,128 N. Y. Supp. 144
Use of an author’s real name on pseudonymous non-copyright works not restrainable, 98
1910Gilbert v. WorkmanChanceryJ. Neville,Times Ja. 19, ’10
Interpolation of song without consent of author of opera enjoined, 100
1910Hein v. HarrisU. S. C. C.J. Hand,175 F. R. 875
Musical copyright infringed by transposition, 170
Affirmed in same year by U. S. C. C. App.
1910Larby v. LoveKing’s BenchJ. Bucknill,Copr. Cas. ’05-’10, 291
Upholds prohibition against underselling in bill of sale, 57
1910Monckton v. Gramophone Co.ChanceryJ. Joyce,Times D. 6, ’10
Common law cannot protect after publication, 62
1910Park & Pollard v. KellerstrassU. S. C. C.J. Philips,181 F. R. 431
Whole work enjoined where infringing parts were inseparable, 258
1910Press Assoc. v. Reporting AgencyChanceryJ. Warrington,Times D. 8, ’10
Election returns protected against “unfair competition,” 89
1910Record & Guide Co. v. BromleyU. S. C. C.J. McPherson,175 F. R. 156
Omission of date vitiates copyright notice though given on same page, 128; substitution of name in copyright notice without authority of law voids copyright, 136
1910Rex v. BokenhamCent. Crim. Ct.Com. Serj.,Times Jl. 22, ’10
Piracy from surreptitiously obtained copies of poems punished by imprisonment, 277
1910Stern v. RemickU. S. C. C.J. Hand,175 F. R. 282
Sale of single copy held to constitute publication, 127; use of Roman for Arabic numerals in copyright notice immaterial, 130
1910West Pub. Co. v. Thompson Co.U. S. C. C. App.J. Ward,176 F. R. 833
One copyright notice suffices to cover earlier copyrights of parts, 132; list made to run down cases permissible, but extensive copying from digest an infringement, 259
1910White-Smith v. GoffU. S. C. C.J. Brown,180 F. R. 256
Renewal personal to author or heirs only, except possibly in case of work assigned before publication, 116
1911Copyright act1 & 2 Geo. V c. 46
1911Shepard v. TaylorU. S. C. C.J. Hazel,185 F. R. 941
Common errors prima facie proof of infringement, 258
1911White v. BenderU. S. C. C.J. Ray,185 F. R. 921
Citations may be utilized for verification, but bodily transfer is infringement, 257

Leading references are in black face figures. References to statutes are designated by § (without prefix referring to the American code, with preceding E referring to the new British code, C to Canadian measure and Au. to Australian code), International Copyright Union conventions by I, and Pan American conventions by P; those to U. S. Copyright Office Rules and Regulations are preceded by R. The page numeration also indicates character of reference, pp. 1-41 covering historical portion; pp. 42-310, specific subject chapters, chiefly American and British; pp. 311-372, international copyright; pp. 373-429, copyright in other countries; pp. 430-462, business relations and literature. Law cases are followed by date, serving as reference to chronological table.

← Back to Copyright: Its History and Its Law

Scroll to Top