Chronological Table of Laws and Cases, English and American
This table gives in chronological order the statutes, with reference to their place in the statute books, and historical, leading and recent cases with the name of the court, of the judge presiding or giving the opinion, and the reference to the law reports, also an epitome of the point cited in the text, with page reference. It is not intended to cover minor cases, not settling any principle, and where a decision has been reversed on appeal, the case in the lower court may not be given unless some definite point was there settled. The usual law report abbreviations are employed; outside of these, Copinger refers to Copinger’s “Law of Copyright,” Copr. Cas. to the annual summary of copyright cases edited by McGillivray and published by the English Publishers Association, Hamlin Copr. C. & D. to Hamlin’s “Copyright Cases and Decisions, 1891-1903,” published for the American Publishers’ Copyright League, Times to the London Times legal column, and Pub. Week. to the Publishers’ Weekly, of New York. English and American cases can be distinguished by the name of the court, judge or report. Cases are entered alphabetically in the general index with references to the year and to the page of text.
| 1710 | Act for the encouragement of learning | 8 Anne, c. 19 | ||
| 1735 | Engraving copyright act | 8 Geo. II, c. 13 | ||
| 1735 | Eyre v. Walker | Chancery | Jekyll, M. R., | 4 Bur. 2325 |
| “The whole duty of man” protected at common law after statutory term, 24 | ||||
| 1739 | Prohibition of foreign reprints act | 12 Geo. II, c. 36 | ||
| 1740 | Gyles v. Wilcox | Chancery | L. Hardwicke, | 2 Atk. 141 |
| Condemning reprint “colorably shortened only,” but not “a real and fair abridgment,” 80 | ||||
| 1741 | Pope v. Curl | Chancery | L. C. Hardwicke, | 2 Atk. 342 |
| Republication of letters enjoined, 92 | ||||
| 1766 | Engraving copyright act | 7 Geo. III, c. 38 | ||
| 1769 | Millar v. Taylor | King’s Bench | L. Mansfield, | 4 Bur. 2303 |
| Thomson’s “Seasons” protected at common law in perpetuity, 25 | ||||
| 1774 | “Newbery’s case” | King’s Bench | L. C. Apsley, | Lofft, 775 |
| Abridgment involving understanding and skill “an allowable and meritorious work,” 80 | ||||
| 1774 | Donaldson v. Becket | House of Lords | 2 Bro. P. C. 129 | |
| Thomson’s “Seasons”—common law rights abrogated by Statute of Anne, 7, 25, 26, 41 | ||||
| 1774 | Thompson v. Stanhope | Chancery | Ld. Apsley, | Amb. 737 |
| Publication prevented of letters, though a gift from author, 92 | ||||
| 1775 | [University] copyright act | 15 Geo. III, c. 53 | ||
| 1777 | Prints copyright act | 17 Geo. III, c. 57 | ||
| 1783 | U. S. Constitution | Art. I, § 8 | ||
| 1783-90 State copyright laws | ||||
| 1787 | Copyright in designs act | 27 Geo. III, c. 38 | ||
| 1789 | Copyright in designs act | 29 Geo. III, c. 19 | ||
| 1790 | U. S. general copyright act | |||
| 1794 | Copyright in designs act | 34 Geo. III, c. 23 | ||
| 1798 | Sculpture copyright act | 38 Geo. III, c. 71 | ||
| 1798 | Beckford v. Hood | King’s Bench | L. Kenyon, | 7 T. R. 620 |
| Common law remedies also applied in statutory period, 27 | ||||
| 1801 | Act for the further encouragement of learning | 41 Geo. III, c. 107 | ||
| 1801 | Cary v. Longman | King’s Bench | L. Kenyon, | 1 East, 358 |
| New added material to non-copyright book, protectable as such, 76 | ||||
| 1802 | U. S. Supplementary act (engravings, etc.) | |||
| 1812 | Morris v. Colman | Chancery | L. C. Eldon, | 18 Vesey, 437 |
| Author under exclusive contract enjoined from furnishing plays elsewhere, 441 | ||||
| 1814 | Sculpture copyright act | 54 Geo. III, c. 56 | ||
| 1814 | Amendatory copyright act, for printed books | 54 Geo. III, c. 156 | ||
| 1817 | Gale v. Leckie | King’s Bench | L. Ellenborough, | 2 Starkie, 107 |
| Author liable for failure to complete work, 441 | ||||
| 1817 | Southey v. Sherwood | Chancery | L. Eldon, | 2 Meriv. 435 |
| No copyright in immoral book. No right to hold what there was no right to sell, 86 | ||||
| 1819 | U. S. act extending jurisdiction of Circuit Courts | |||
| 1819 | Clarke v. Price | Chancery | L. C. Eldon, | 2 Wils. C. R. 157 |
| Author cannot be compelled to write, 441 | ||||
| 1824 | Barfield v. Nicholson | Chancery | V. C. Leach, | 2 L. J. Ch. 90 |
| Author may not prejudice sale through another book of like subject, 441 | ||||
| 1825 | Abernethy v. Hutchinson | Chancery | L. C. Eldon, | 3 L. J. (O. S.) Ch. 209 |
| Unwritten lecture—oral delivery not publication, 90 | ||||
| 1826 | Mawman v. Tegg | Chancery | L. C. Eldon, | 2 Russ. 385 |
| “Fair use” defined. Inseparable use of copyright material renders whole work an infringement, 256 | ||||
| 1828 | Clayton v. Stone | U. S. C. C. | J. Thompson, | 2 Paine, 382 |
| Copyrightable property not determined by size, form or shape, but by subject-matter, 69 | ||||
| 1831 | U. S. general copyright act | |||
| 1831 | Brooke v. Chitty | Chancery | L. Brougham, | 2 Cooper (Cottenham), 216 |
| Court cannot restrain book until there is actual printing and publication, 442 | ||||
| 1832 | Archbold v. Sweet | King’s Bench | C. J. Tenterden, | 5 Carr. & P. 219 |
| Alterations by publisher not permitted to author’s injury, 443 | ||||
| 1833 | Dramatic copyright act | 3 & 4 Will. IV, c. 15 | ||
| 1834 | U. S. supplementary act (assignment) | |||
| 1834 | Wheaton v. Peters | U. S. Sup. Ct. | J. McLean, | 8 Pet. 591 |
| U. S. Act of 1790 abrogates common law rights after publication, 40, 41; “There is no common law of the U. S.,” 44; exact conformity with statute requisite, 149 | ||||
| 1835 | Lectures copyright act | 5 & 6 Will. IV, c. 65 | ||
| 1836 | Prints and engravings copyright act (Ireland) | 6 & 7 Will. IV, c. 59 | ||
| 1836 | Copyright act, library deposit copies | 6 & 7 Will. IV, c. 110 | ||
| 1838 | International copyright act | 1 & 2 Vict. c. 59 | ||
| 1839 | Copyright in designs (fabrics) act | 2 Vict. c. 13 | ||
| 1839 | Amendatory copyright act, for designs | 2 Vict. c. 17 | ||
| 1840 | Bell v. Locke | [N. Y.] Chancery | Chan. Walworth, | 8 Paige, 74 |
| Deceiving public by use of like title is an infringement, 83 | ||||
| 1840 | Dwight v. Appleton | U. S. C. C. | J. Thompson, | 1 N. Y. Leg. Obs. 195 |
| Copyright notice in succeeding volumes held unnecessary, 133 | ||||
| 1841 | Folsom v. Marsh | U. S. Sup. Ct. | J. Story, | 2 Story, 100 |
| Author of letters has sole right to copyright, 92; piracy if another’s labor is substantially appropriated to injurious extent, 252 | ||||
| 1841 | Gibson v. Carruthers Exchequer | 8 M. & W. 321 | ||
| Author cannot on bankruptcy of publisher be required to complete work, 452 | ||||
| 1841 | Sweet v. Cater | Chancery | V. C. Shadwell, | 5 Jur. 68 |
| Publisher may prevent author from issuing competing edition, 444 | ||||
| 1842 | Copyright act | 5 & 6 Vict. c. 45 | ||
| 1842 | Customs act | 5 & 6 Vict. c. 47 | ||
| 1842 | Designs copyright act | 5 & 6 Vict. c. 100 | ||
| 1843 | Amendatory copyright act, for designs | 6 & 7 Vict. c. 65 | ||
| 1843 | Lennie v. Pillans | Scotch Ct. Sess. | L. P. Boyle, | 111 Sc. Rev. R. 2, s. 171 |
| Compilations of non-copyright material showing originality and labor, protected, 81 | ||||
| 1844 | International copyright act | 7 & 8 Vict. c. 12 | ||
| 1844 | Act to reduce duties on books and prints | 7 & 8 Vict. c. 73 | ||
| 1846 | Amendatory act for duties on books | 9 & 10 Vict. c. 58 | ||
| 1846 | U. S. act. Deposit of copies | |||
| 1847 | Colonial copyright act | 10 & 11 Vict. c. 95 | ||
| 1847 | Story’s Executors v. Holcombe | U. S. C. C. | J. McLean, | 4 McLean, 306 |
| Fair abridgment, by ruling precedents, not an invasion of literary property, 81 | ||||
| 1848 | Baker v. Taylor | U. S. C. C. | J. Betts, | 2 Blatch. 82 |
| Error of 1847 for 1846 in copyright notice invalidates copyright, 129 | ||||
| 1848 | Russell v. Smith | Queen’s Bench | L. Denman, | 12 Q. B. 217 |
| Dramatic rendition of song without costume or scenery adjudged “dramatic piece,” 176, 191; registration of dramatic piece optional in England, 189 | ||||
| 1849 | Albert, Prince, v. Strange | Ct. App. | V. C. Bruce, | 2 De G. & Sm. 652 |
| Common law protects until publication, 187; descriptive catalogue and exhibition of copies of unpublished art work infringements, 238 | ||||
| 1850 | Copyright in designs act | 13 & 14 Vict. c. 104 | ||
| 1851 | Protection of works. London international exhibition | 14 Vict. c. 8 | ||
| 1852 | International copyright act | 15 & 16 Vict. c. 12 | ||
| 1852 | Bogue v. Houlston | Chancery | V. C. Parker, | 5 De G. & Sm. 267 |
| Copyright extends to every part of a book, 76 | ||||
| 1852 | Little v. Gould | U. S. C. C. App. | J. Nelson, | 2 Blatch. 362 |
| State copyright owner in work of salaried law reporter, 98 | ||||
| 1852 | Pulte v. Derby | U. S. C. C. | J. McLean, | 5 McLean, 328 |
| Publishing contract for “edition,” does not prohibit successive printings, 446 | ||||
| 1853 | Customs consolidation act | 16 & 17 Vict. c. 107 | ||
| 1853 | Cox v. Cox | Chancery | V. C. Wood, | 11 Hare, 118 |
| Writer may not prevent alterations made by employer, 443 | ||||
| 1853 | Stowe v. Thomas | U. S. C. C. | J. Grier, | 2 Wall Jr. 547 |
| No exclusive right of translation under early law, 77 | ||||
| 1854 | Jefferys v. Boosey | House of Lords | 4 H. L. C. 815 | |
| Definition of the two senses of copyright, 1, 2, 4; non-resident foreigner could not acquire copyright under act of 1710 by first publication in England, 108, 373 | ||||
| 1854 | Stevens v. Benning | Chancery | V. C. Wood, | 1 Kay & J. 168 |
| Contract for publication a personal contract not assignable without consent, 444 | ||||
| 1855 | Customs consolidation act. | 18 & 19 Vict. c. 96 | ||
| 1855 | U. S. Act. Deposits through mails free | |||
| 1855 | Stevens v. Benning | Ct. App. | Lds. J. Bruce & Turner, | 6 De G. M. & G. 223 |
| Affirming Stevens v. Benning. | ||||
| 1856 | U. S. supplementary act (dramatic) | |||
| 1858 | Amendatory copyright act, for designs | 21 & 22 Vict. c. 70 | ||
| 1858 | Reade v. Bentley | Chancery | V. C. Wood, | 4 K. & J. 656 |
| Contract for publication a personal contract of “joint adventure” terminable by author if not to publisher’s loss, 434, 444 | ||||
| 1859 | U. S. act. Place of deposit | |||
| 1860 | Blackwood v. Brewster | Scotch Ct. Sess. | 23 Sc. Sess. c. 2, s. 142 | |
| Reprints to replace destroyed copies do not constitute a new edition, 445 | ||||
| 1860 | Crookes v. Petter | Rolls Ct. | Romilly, M. R., | 6 Jur. 1131 |
| Editor’s name not requisite part of title, 445 | ||||
| 1860 | Turner v. Robinson | Irish Ct. Chanc. | Smith, M. R., | 10 Ir. Ch. R. 121 |
| Exhibition, with restriction as to copying, not publication, 232 | ||||
| 1860 | Turner v. Robinson | Ct. App. | L. C. Brady, | 10 Ir. Ch. R. 510 |
| Liability under breach of contract, 232; Academy exhibition considered publication, 232 | ||||
| 1861 | Amendatory copyright act, for designs | 24 & 25 Vict. c. 73 | ||
| 1861 | Statute law revision act | 24 & 25 Vict. c. 101 | ||
| 1861 | U. S. act. Appeal for copyright cases to Supreme Court | |||
| 1862 | Fine arts copyright act | 25 & 26 Vict. c. 68 | ||
| 1862 | Boucicault v. Fox | U. S. C. C | J. Shipman, | 5 Blatch. 87 |
| A man’s intellectual productions his own, except under valid agreement with employer, 97 | ||||
| 1862 | Drury v. Ewing | U. S. C. C. | J. Leavitt, | 1 Bond, 540 |
| Diagram with directions for dress cutting adjudged “book,” 69 | ||||
| 1862 | Howitt v. Hall | Chancery | V. C. Wood, | 6 L. T. (n. s.) 348 |
| Copies printed within term of contract may be sold after expiration, 445 | ||||
| 1862 | Reade v. Conquest | Common Pleas | C J. Erle, | 11 C. B. (n. s.) 478 |
| Dramatization based on novelization, infringement of original play, 172 | ||||
| 1863 | Boucicault v. Delafield | Chancery | V. C Wood, | 1 H. & M. 597 |
| First publication outside British Dominions under int. copr. act, forfeits playright, 184 | ||||
| 1863 | Hotten v. Arthur | Chancery | V. C. Wood, | 1 H. & M. 603 |
| Catalogue of old books copyrightable, 73 | ||||
| 1863 | Tinsley v. Lacy | Chancery | V. C Wood, | 1 H. & M. 747 |
| Printed dramatization enjoined as using substantial parts of novel, 173 | ||||
| 1864 | Low v. Routledge | Chancery | V. C. Kindersley, | 33 L. J. (n. s.) Ch. 717 |
| Inaccuracy in name of proprietor invalidates copyright entry, 128 | ||||
| 1865 | U. S. supplementary act (photographs) | |||
| 1867 | Statute law revision act | 30 & 31 Vict. c. 59 | ||
| 1867 | U. S. act. Penalty for failure to deposit | |||
| 1867 | Maxwell v. Hogg | Chancery | L. Cairns, | 2 Ch. D. 307 |
| Belgravia—Title not protectable until associated with a published work, 75, 84, 85 | ||||
| 1868 | Daly v. Palmer | U. S. C. C. | J. Blatchford, | 6 Blatch. 256 |
| Test of piracy defined, 175 | ||||
| 1868 | Routledge v. Low | House of Lords | L. R., 3 H. L. 100 | |
| Foreigner temporarily resident at first publication may acquire British copyright under act of 1842, 109; first publication probably single requisite for copyright 109, 374 | ||||
| 1869 | Lawrence v. Dana | U. S. C. C. | J. Clifford, | 4 Cliff. 1 |
| An abridgment permitted as established by precedent, 81; new notice on new edition protects matter copyright in old edition, 134; “copying is not confined to literal repetition,” 254 | ||||
| 1869 | Taylor v. Pillow | Chancery | V. C. James, | L. R. 7 Eq. 418 |
| Proprietor, after assigning copyright, may dispose of unsold copies, 446 | ||||
| 1870 | U. S. consolidation act | |||
| 1870 | Black v. Murray | Scotch Ct. Sess. | L. Inglis, | IX Sc. Rev. R. 3, s. 443 |
| New editions “enlarged and improved” copyrightable, 75 | ||||
| 1871 | Stannard v. Harrison | Chancery | V. C. Bacon, | 24 L. T. (n. s.) 570 |
| Right in map drawn to order vests in employer, 239 | ||||
| 1872 | Clark v. Bishop | Exchequer | C. B. Kelly, | 25 L. T. (n. s.) 908 |
| Song dramatically rendered protected as dramatic piece, 176 | ||||
| 1872 | Cobbett v. Woodward | Chancery | L. Romilly, | L. R. 14 Eq. 407 |
| No copyright in an advertisement, 73 | ||||
| 1872 | Osgood v. Allen | U. S. C. C. | J. Shepley, | 1 Holmes, 185 |
| “Our Young Folks”—a title not copyrightable as such, 82, 85 | ||||
| 1872 | Palmer v. DeWitt | N. Y. Ct. App. | J. Allen, | 47 N. Y. 532 |
| Performance of play not publication, 180 | ||||
| 1873 | U. S. act. Inclusion in Revised Statutes | |||
| 1874 | U. S. act. Notice, fees, etc. | |||
| 1874 | Isaacs v. Daly | N. Y. Sup. Ct. | J. Curtis, | 7 Jones & Sp. 511 |
| Title “Charity” cannot be monopolized, 82, 84 | ||||
| 1874 | Toole v. Young | Queen’s Bench | C. J. Cockburn, | 9 Q. B. 523 |
| Right of dramatization not included under book copyright in England, 172 | ||||
| 1874 | Ward v. Beeton | Chancery | V. C. Malins, | L. R. 19 Eq. 207 |
| Proprietary name may not be used on competing publication, 445 | ||||
| 1874 | Warne v. Routledge | Chancery | Jessel, M. R., | L. R. 18 Eq. 497 |
| Right of publishing exclusive fortune of contract only, 445 | ||||
| 1875 | International copyright act | 38 Vict. c. 12 | ||
| 1875 | Canada copyright act | 38 & 39 Vict. c. 53 | ||
| 1875 | Amendatory copyright act for designs | 38 & 39 Vict. c. 93 | ||
| 1875 | Banks v. McDivitt | U. S. C. C. | J. Shipman, | 13 Blatch. 163 |
| Test of piracy defined, 251 | ||||
| 1875 | Boucicault v. Hart | U. S. C. C. | J. Hunt, | 13 Blatch. 37 |
| Exact conformity with statute requisite, 149 | ||||
| 1875 | Parkinson v. Laselle | U. S. C. C. | J. Sawyer, | 3 Sawyer, 330 |
| Exact conformity with statute requisite, 149 | ||||
| 1876 | Customs law consolidation act | 39 & 40 Vict. c. 36 | ||
| 1876 | Boucicault v. Chatterton | Chancery | J. James, | 5 Ch. D. 267 |
| Previous performance of “Shaughraun” in N. Y. forfeited playright, 184 | ||||
| 1876 | Chatterton v. Cave | Ct. App. | C. J. Cockburn, | 46 L. J. (n. s.) C. L. 97 |
| Rival dramatization, utilizing not substantial added scenes, permitted, 174 | ||||
| 1878 | Chatterton v. Cave | House of Lords | 3 A. C. 483 | |
| Following decision of lower court. | ||||
| 1878 | Weldon v. Dicks | Chancery | V. C. Malins, | 10 Ch. D. 247 |
| Title “Trial and Triumph” protected as virtually trade-mark, 83 | ||||
| 1879 | U. S. act. Transmission through mails | |||
| 1879 | Hole v. Bradbury | Chancery | J. Fry, | 12 Ch. D. 886 |
| Authors entitled to resume rights succeeding publishers, 445 | ||||
| 1879 | Kelly v. Byles | Chancery | V. C. Bacon, | 13 Ch. D. 682 |
| Title “Post Office directory” not copyrightable. No resemblance of publications, 83 | ||||
| 1880 | Putnam v. Pollard | N. Y. Sup. Ct. | J. Beach, | N. Y. Daily Reg. O. 13 ’80 |
| State common law superseded by U. S. statute, 40 | ||||
| 1881 | Dicks v. Yates | Chancery | V. C. Bacon, | 18 Ch. D. 76 |
| “Splendid misery”—title thrice used, common property, not protectable, 83 | ||||
| 1882 | Copyright (musical compositions) act | 45 & 46 Vict. c. 40 | ||
| 1882 | U. S. act. Position of notice | |||
| 1882 | Cable v. Marks | Chancery | V. C. Bacon, | 47 L. T. (n. s.) 432 |
| Shadow-trick perforated card, not copyrightable, 242 | ||||
| 1882 | Chappell v. Boosey | Chancery | J. North, | 21 Ch. D. 232 |
| Publication as book before performance does not preclude performing rights, 183, 184 | ||||
| 1882 | Maple v. Junior Army & Navy Stores | Ct. App. | J. Jessel, | 21 Ch. D. 369 |
| Illustrated advertising catalogue protected, 73 | ||||
| 1883 | Patents, designs, and trade marks act | 46 & 47 Vict. c. 57 | ||
| 1883 | Clemens v. Belford | U. S. C. C. | J. Blodgett, | 14 F. R. 728 |
| Right to publish involves right to state authorship, 98 | ||||
| 1883 | Thomas v. Lennon | U. S. C. C. | J. Lowell, | 14 F. R. 849 |
| Unpublished oratorio infringed by orchestral score from non-copyright piano arrangement, 187 | ||||
| 1884 | Burrow-Giles Lith. Co. v. Sarony | U. S. Sup. Ct. | J. Miller, | 111 U. S. 53 |
| “Writings” construed to cover photographs, 67, 240; N. Sarony (for Napoleon Sarony) sufficing as name, 129 | ||||
| 1884 | Estes v. Williams | U. S. C. C. | J. Wheeler, | 21 F. R. 189 |
| “Chatterbox”—title restrained from use on juveniles of like general character, 83 | ||||
| 1884 | Duck v. Bates | Ct. App. | Brett, M. R., | 13 Q. B. 843 |
| Amateur performance not for profit not a public representation, 186 | ||||
| 1884 | Nicols v. Pitman | Chancery | J. Kay, | 26 Ch. D. 374 |
| Indirect copying by shorthand characters an infringement, 254 | ||||
| 1886 | International copyright act | 49 & 50 Vict. c. 33 | ||
| 1886 | Aronson v. Fleckenstein | U. S. C. C. | J. Blodgett, | 28 F. R. 75 |
| Title of drama protected under common law, 192 | ||||
| 1886 | Harper v. Shoppell | U. S. C. C. | J. Wallace, | 23 Blatch. 431 |
| Unprinted electrotype did not infringe copyright, 235 | ||||
| 1886 | Holloway v. Bradley | U. S. C. C. | J. Butler, | Pub. Week. 30:223 |
| Publisher may affix material to copyright book, 100 | ||||
| 1886 | Monaghan v. Taylor | Queen’s Bench | L. C. J. Coleridge, | 2 T. L. R. 685 |
| Proprietor of music hall liable for infringement by singer, 193 | ||||
| 1887 | Estes v. Worthington | U. S. C. C. | J. Shipman, | 31 F. R. 154 |
| Title “Chatterbox” protected as trade-mark against simulating publication of differing contents, 84, 261 | ||||
| 1887 | Harper v. Franklin Sq. Lib. Co. | U. S. C. C. | J. Waite, | Pub. Week. 31:372 |
| Trade-mark rights in name “Franklin Square library” protected, 262 | ||||
| 1888 | Copyright (musical compositions) act | 51 & 52 Vict. c. 17 | ||
| 1888 | Patents, designs and trade marks act | 51 & 52 Vict. c. 50 | ||
| 1888 | Callaghan v. Myers | U. S. Sup. Ct. | J. Blatchford, | 128 U. S. 617 |
| 1866 for 1867 does not invalidate copyright notice, 130 | ||||
| 1888 | Gottsberger v. Estes | U. S. C. C. | J. Colt, | 33 F. R. 381 |
| Publication before deposit voided copyright (under old law), 136 | ||||
| 1888 | Mitchell & Miller v. White & Allen | N. Y. Sup. Ct. | Pub. Week. 34:586 | |
| “Life”—misleading use of title enjoined, 84 | ||||
| 1888 | Munro v. Beadle | N. Y. Sup. Ct. | J. Ingraham, | 18 St. R. 278 |
| “Sleuth” as a dictionary word not protectable, 262 | ||||
| 1888 | Munro v. Smith | N. Y. Sup. Ct. | J. O’Brien, | 18 St. R. 279 |
| Use of name “Sleuth” when misleading the public actionable, 262 | ||||
| 1888 | Schumacher v. Wogram | U. S. C. C. | J. Wallace, | 35 F. R. 210 |
| Copyright probably voided by too early date in notice, 130; picture intended for cigar label not copyrightable, but trade-mark, 237 | ||||
| 1888 | Warne v. Seebohm | Chancery | J. Stirling, | 39 Ch. D. 73 |
| Dramatization quoting beyond fair use infringement of novel, 173 | ||||
| 1889 | Revenue act | 52 & 53 Vict. c. 42 | ||
| 1889 | Beere v. Ellis | Queen’s Bench | B. Pollock, | 5 T. L. R. 330 |
| Rival dramatization enjoined, because added features were infringed, 173 | ||||
| 1889 | Cate v. Devon | Chancery | J. North, | 40 Ch. D. 500 |
| Indirect copying from newspaper reprint held infringement, 254 | ||||
| 1889 | Everson v. Young | D. C. Sup. Ct. | J. Cole, | 26 W. L. R. 546 |
| Blank book not copyrightable, 72; librarian of Congress not discretionary officer, 72, 96 | ||||
| 1889 | Gilmore v. Anderson | U. S. C. C. | J. Wheeler, | 38 F. R. 846 |
| Common use of non-copyright material or work on same subject not infringement, 255 | ||||
| 1890 | Munro v. Beadle | N. Y. App. Div. | J. Macomber, | 55 Hun 312 |
| “Sleuth” properly subject of trade-mark, 262 | ||||
| 1890 | Munro v. Smith | U. S. C. C. | J. Shipman, | 42 F. R. 266 |
| Illustration picturing “Old Sleuth” not infringement, 262 | ||||
| 1890 | Schlesinger v. Bedford | Chancery | J. Kekewich, | 63 L. T. (n. s.) 762 |
| Independent and “essentially different” dramatization permitted despite author’s own dramatization, 173 | ||||
| 1890 | Schlesinger v. Turner | Chancery | J. Kekewich, | 63 L. T. (n. s.) 764 |
| Plays substantially similar an infringement, 173 | ||||
| 1891 | U. S. amendatory (inter. copr.) act | |||
| 1891 | Munro v. Tousey | N. Y. Ct. App. | J. Gray, | 129 N. Y. 38 |
| Name “Sleuth” not protectable, 262 | ||||
| 1891 | Black v. Ehrich | U. S. C. C. | J. Wallace, | 44 F. R. 793 |
| Title “Encyclopædia Britannica” not protected when public is not misled, 261 | ||||
| 1891 | Dodd v. Smith | Penn. Sup. Ct. | Per curiam, | 144 Pa. St. 340 |
| Underselling by rebinds of paper-covered edition not enjoinable, 263 | ||||
| 1891 | Falk v. Brett Lith. Co. | U. S. C. C. | J. Wheeler, | 48 F. R. 678 |
| Posing for photograph justifies copyright by photographer.—Reversed lithograph infringement, 241 | ||||
| 1891 | Falk v. Gast | U. S. C. C. | J. Coxe, | 48 F. R. 262 |
| Copyright not forfeited by omission of notice on remounting of photographs by another than proprietor, 236; posing for photograph justifies copyright by photographer, 241 | ||||
| 1891 | Fishburn v. Hollingshead | Chancery | J. Stirling, | [1891] 2 Ch. 371 |
| Registration and deposit requisite except under International copyright act, 313 | ||||
| 1892 | Duck v. Mayen | Queen’s Bench | J. Day, | 8 T. L. R. 339 |
| Limitation of specific license for drama enforced, 190 | ||||
| 1892 | Fishel v. Lueckel | U. S. C. C. | J. Townsend, | 53 F. R. 499 |
| Appropriation of part of a work an infringement, 244 | ||||
| 1892 | Fuller v. Bemis | U. S. C. C. | J. Lacombe, | 50 F. R. 926 |
| Skirt dance not a dramatic composition, 177 | ||||
| 1892 | Lamb v. Evans | Ct. App. | L. J. Lindley, | [1893], 1 Ch. 218 |
| Copyright in sheet of advertisements upheld, 74 | ||||
| 1892 | Lee v. Gibbings | Chancery | J. Kekewich, | 8 T. L. R. 773 |
| Injury to author’s repute question of libel not of copyright, 274 | ||||
| 1892 | Lucas v. Williams | Ct. App. | L. Esher, | L. R. [1892] 2 Q. B. 113 |
| Photograph of engraving infringes original painting, 243, 274 | ||||
| 1892 | Walter v. Steinkopff | Chancery | J. North, | [1892] 3 Ch. 489 |
| Copyright in form of news protectable, 89, 259. Copying two-fifths of newspaper article, “unfair use,” 259 | ||||
| 1892 | Daly v. Webster | U. S. C. C. App. | J. Lacombe, | 56 F. R. 483 |
| Infringement by single situation from dramatic work, 191; change of sub-title after copyrighting immaterial, 192 | ||||
| 1893 | U. S. enabling act (deposit) | |||
| 1893 | Black v. Allen | U. S. C. C. | J. Townsend, | 56 F. R. 764 |
| Inclusion of copyright material in non-copyright work does not vitiate copyright, 261; copyright may be transferred to foreign owner, 261; variation from registered title on use in cyclopædia immaterial, 261 | ||||
| 1893 | Falk v. Donaldson | U. S. C. C. | J. Townsend, | 57 F. R. 32 |
| Differences in lithographic reproduction of photograph not a defense, 244 | ||||
| 1893 | Falk v. Gast | U. S. C. C. App. | J. Shipman, | 54 F. R. 890 |
| Miniature samples not a publication of picture. Affirming Falk v. Gast, 235 | ||||
| 1893 | Falk v. Heffron | U. S. C. C. | J. Wheeler, | 56 F. R. 299 |
| “Sheets” defined—copyright law must be strictly construed as to forfeiture and penalties, 271 | ||||
| 1893 | French v. Day et al. | Queen’s Bench | J. Kennedy, | 9 T. L. R. 548 |
| Proprietor, not manager, of theatre responsible defendant, 193 | ||||
| 1893 | Hanfstaengl v. Holloway | Queen’s Bench | J. Charles, | [1893] 2 Q. B. 1 |
| Registration and deposit not requisite, 313 | ||||
| 1893 | Macdonald v. National Review | West. Co. Ct. | Copinger 782 | |
| Printers’ proof sent by publisher to author implies acceptance of ms., 442 | ||||
| 1893 | Reichardt v. Sapte | Queen’s Bench | J. Hawkins, | [1893] 2 Q. B. 308 |
| Similar play previously written but later performed cannot be enjoined, 187 | ||||
| 1894 | Drummond v. Altemus | U. S. C. C. | J. Dallas, | 60 F. R. 338 |
| Author may restrain under common law imperfect reports of lectures, 264 | ||||
| 1894 | Ellis v. Ogden | Queen’s Bench | J. Collins, | 11 T. L. R. 50 |
| Right in photographs not paid for belongs to photographer, 239 | ||||
| 1894 | French v. Kreling | U. S. C. C. | J. Hawley, | 63 F. R. 621 |
| Printing of libretto for sole use of singers not publication, 181 | ||||
| 1894 | Gilbert v. Star | Chancery | J. Chitty, | 11 T. L. R. 4 |
| Newspaper report of play under rehearsal forbidden under common law, 186 | ||||
| 1894 | Hanfstaengl v. American Tobacco Co. | Ct. App. | L. Esher, | [1895] 1 Q. B. 347 |
| Registration and deposit in England not necessary for foreign work, 313 | ||||
| 1894 | Hanfstaengl v. Baines | House of Lords | [1895] A. C. 20 | |
| Tableaux not infringement of pictures—“Design” does not cover tableaux, 242 | ||||
| 1894 | Henderson v. Tompkins | U. S. C. C. | J. Putnam, | 60 F. R. 758 |
| Literary merit not requisite, 177 | ||||
| 1894 | Press Pub. Co. v. Falk | U. S. C. C. | J. Wheeler, | 59 F. R. 324 |
| Proprietorship of gratuitous photograph of actress remains with photographer, 238 | ||||
| 1894 | Social Register Assoc. v. Howard | U. S. C. C. | J. Green, | 60 F. R. 270 |
| Similar title enjoined as unfair competition, 262 | ||||
| 1894 | Springer v. Falk | U. S. C. C. App. | J. Lacombe, | 59 F. R. 707 |
| Composite photograph from two copyrighted portraits held an infringement, 244 | ||||
| 1894 | Werckmeister v. Springer | U. S. C. C. | J. Townsend, | 63 F. R. 808 |
| Copyright does not pass with sale of painting, 234; illustration of picture in exhibition catalogue not publication, 234 | ||||
| 1894 | Littleton v. Ditson | U. S. C. C. | J. Colt, | 62 F. R. 597 |
| Music sheets excepted from manufacturing provisions, 167 | ||||
| 1894 | West Pub. Co. v. Lawyers’ Pub. Co. | U. S. C. C. | J. Coxe, | 64 F. R. 360 |
| Only proved “instances of piracy” in law digest enjoined, 258 | ||||
| 1895 | U. S. act. Government documents not copyrightable | |||
| 1895 | U. S. act. Penalties for infringement of photographs, etc. | |||
| 1895-1905 State dramatic laws | ||||
| 1895 | Ditson v. Littleton | U. S. C. C. App. | Per curiam, | 67 F. R. 905 |
| Affirming Littleton v. Ditson | ||||
| 1895 | Bolton v. Aldin | Queen’s Bench | J. Grantham, | 65 L. J. Q. B. 120 |
| Drawing remade from photograph infringement, 241 | ||||
| 1895 | Chicago Dollar Directory Co. v. Chicago Dir. Co. | U. S. C. C. App. | J. Baker, | 65 F. R. 463 |
| Quantity of common errors evidence of infringement in compilation, 257 | ||||
| 1895 | Ellis v. Marshall | Queen’s Bench | J. Charles, | 11 T. L. R. 522 |
| Right in photograph paid for vests in sitter, 239 | ||||
| 1895 | Exchange Tel. Co. v. Gregory | Queen’s Bench | L. Esher, M. R., | [1896] 1 Q. B. 147 |
| Information furnished to subscribers protected, 89 | ||||
| 1895 | Fuller v. Blackpool Winter Gardens Co. | Ct. of App. | L. Esher, M. R., | [1895] 2 Q. B. 429 |
| Song in costume but without dramatic action, not dramatic piece, 176 | ||||
| 1895 | Harper v. Ganthony | U. S. C. C. | J. Lacombe, | Hamlin Copr. C. & D. 138 |
| “Trilby”—monologues in costume following plot, a dramatic infringement, 82, 171 | ||||
| 1895 | Harper v. Ranous | U. S. C. C. | J. Lacombe, | 67 F. R. 904 |
| Right of dramatization of “Trilby” included in copyright of novel, 170 | ||||
| 1895 | Keeler v. Standard Folding Bed Co. | U. S. Sup. Ct. | J. Shiras, | 157 U. S. 659 |
| Sale of patented article absolute and complete unless restricted by contract, 54 | ||||
| 1895 | Snow v. Mast | U. S. C. C. | J. Sage, | 65 F. R. 995 |
| Abbreviation of date (’94 for 1894) in copyright notice permitted, 130 | ||||
| 1895 | Wheeler v. Cobbey | U. S. C. C. | J. Shiras, | 70 F. R. 487 |
| Damages dependent on forfeiture, within statutory 2 years, 272 | ||||
| 1896 | Webster v. Daly | U. S. Sup. Ct. | J. Fuller, | 163 U. S. 155 |
| Affirming Daly v. Webster | ||||
| 1896 | Gabriel v. McCabe | U. S. C. C. | J. Grosscup, | 74 F. R. 743 |
| License of song for a collection permits use in combination or abridgment of such collection, 82, 256. | ||||
| 1896 | Griffith v. Tower | Chancery | J. Stirling, | L. R. [1897] 1 Ch. 21 |
| Publishing agreement not transferable as bankruptcy asset, 451 | ||||
| 1896 | Guggenheim v. Leng | Queen’s Bench | J. Cave, | 12 T. L. R. 491 |
| Printing illustration as separate supplement infringement, as outside licensed use, 236 | ||||
| 1896 | Ladd v. Oxnard | U. S. C. C. | J. Putnam, | 75 F. R. 703 |
| Leasing a book to subscribers is publication, 53 | ||||
| 1896 | Mead v. West Pub. Co. | U. S. C. C. | J. Lochren, | 80 F. R. 380 |
| Use from copyright book of non-copyright material not infringement, 257 | ||||
| 1896 | Mott v. Clow | U. S. C. C. | J. Grosscup, | 72 F. R. 168 |
| Illustrations in trade catalogue being “mere advertisements” not copyrightable, 237 | ||||
| 1896 | Pierce & Bushnell Co. v. Werckmeister | U. S. C. C. App. | J. Colt, | 72 F. R. 54 |
| Exhibition without copyright notice considered publication, 233 | ||||
| 1896 | Pitt Pitts v. George | Ct. App. | J. Lindley, | [1896] 2 Ch. 866 |
| Importation of foreign edition prohibited under British copyright, 292; “proprietor” means owner of British copyright, 292, (296) | ||||
| 1896 | Press Pub. Co. v. Monroe | U. S. C. C. App. | J. Lacombe, | 73 F. R. 196 |
| Publication without author’s consent does not divest him of any rights, 45; broad interpretation of author’s rights, 48 | ||||
| 1896 | Tree v. Bowkett, | Chancer | J. Kekewich, | 74 L. T. (n. s.) 77 |
| “Trilby”—rival dramatization, copying added scenes enjoined, 174 | ||||
| 1897 | U. S. act. Appointment of Register of Copyrights | |||
| 1897 | U. S. act. Penalty for false claim of copyright | |||
| 1897 | U. S. act. Unauthorized representation | |||
| 1897 | Hoyt v. Bates | U. S. C. C. | J. Putnam, | 81 F. R. 641 |
| Ownership of copyright property is question for state courts, 268 | ||||
| 1897 | Morrison v. Pettibone | U. S. C. C. | J. Seaman, | 87 F. R. 330 |
| Uncompleted reproductions not exact copies and not forfeitable, 272 | ||||
| 1897 | Osgood v. Aloe | U. S. C. C. | J. Adams, | 83 F. R. 470 |
| Omission of name vitiates copyright notice though given in imprint, 128 | ||||
| 1897 | West Pub. Co. v. Lawyers’ Pub. Co. | U. S. C. C. App. | J. Lacombe, | 79 F. R. 756 |
| Whole law digest enjoined, although only parts were infringements, 258 | ||||
| 1898 | Bolton v. London Exhibitions | Queen’s Bench | J. Mathew, | 14 T. L. R. 550 |
| Employer, giving to engraver only “general idea,” not party liable for infringement, 240; lithograph outline from copyright picture, though with other details, held infringement, 244; parties ordering poster held not punishable for infringement by lithographer without their knowledge, 253 | ||||
| 1898 | Broder v. Zeno Mauvais | U. S. C. C. | J. Morrow, | 88 F. R. 74 |
| Indecent song not copyrightable—melody protected, 86 | ||||
| 1898 | Jewellers’ Merc. Agency v. Jeweller’s Wkly Pub. Co. | N. Y. Ct. App. | C. J. Parker, | 155 N. Y. 241 |
| Leasing a book to subscribers is publication, 53 | ||||
| 1898 | Miles v. Amer. News Co. | U. S. C. C. | J. Lacombe, | Hamlin Copr. C. & D. 29 |
| Specific license for limited use of illustrations enforced, 236 | ||||
| 1898 | Mallory v. Mackaye | U. S. C. C. | J. Wheeler, | 86 F. R. 122 |
| Employer entitled to copyright in dramatic works written under salary, 188 | ||||
| 1899 | Mackaye v. Mallory | U. S. C. C. App. | J. Wallace, | 92 F. R. 749 |
| “Modifying” Mallory v. Mackaye, but upholding right of employer | ||||
| 1899 | Bennett v. Carr | U. S. C. C. App. | J. Thomas, | 96 F. R. 213 |
| Copyright invalidated (under old law) by failure to deposit written description of picture, 236 | ||||
| 1899 | Boosey v. Whight | Ct. App. | J. Lindley, | [1900] 1 Ch. 122 |
| Perforated music roll not “copy” of sheet music, 208; marginal directions neither music nor literary composition, 208 | ||||
| 1899 | Brady v. Daly | U. S. Sup. Ct. | J. Peckham, | 175 U. S. 148 |
| Single situation protected as integral part of drama, 191; damages, not penalty, under copyright statute, 272 | ||||
| 1899 | Daly v. Walrath | N. Y. App. Div. | J. Bartlett, | 40 App. Div. 220 |
| Prior printing abroad forfeits American dramatic rights, 181 | ||||
| 1899 | Green v. Irish Independent | Irish Ct. of App. | L. J. Fitz-Gibbon, | [1899] 1 Ir. Rep. 386 |
| Newspaper liable for infringement, though without knowledge, copyr. illustration printed as advertisement, 236, 253 | ||||
| 1899 | Holmes v. Hurst | U. S. Sup. Ct. | J. Brown, | 174 U. S. 82 |
| Copyright protects intellectual production of author, not merely the particular form. “Book” not confined to bound volume, 67 | ||||
| 1899 | McDonald v. Hearst | U. S. C. C. | J. De Haven, | 95 F. R. 656 |
| Employer cannot be held to penal responsibility for act of agent, 271 | ||||
| 1899 | Maxwell v. Goodwin | U. S. C. C. | J. Seaman, | 93 F. R. 665 |
| Playright in unpublished work, inherent under common law, 187 | ||||
| 1899 | Murphy v. Christian Press Assoc. | N. Y. App. Div. | J. Cullen, | 38 N. Y. App. Div. 426 |
| Decision against restraint of trade not applicable to copyright monopolies, 50 | ||||
| 1900 | U. S. act. Hawaii and Porto Rico protection | |||
| 1900 | Bennett v. Boston Traveler Co. | U. S. C. C. App. | J. Colt, | 101 F. R. 445 |
| Suit must be brought under general copyright of newspaper, when portion is not specifically copyrighted, 272 | ||||
| 1900 | Dielman v. White | U. S. C. C. | J. Lowell, | 102 F. R. 892 |
| Contract with U. S. Govt. failed to reserve copyright on designs, 234 | ||||
| 1900 | Maloney v. Foote | U. S. C. C. | J. Pardee, | 101 F. R. 264 |
| No infringement by acts before copyrighting, 274 | ||||
| 1900 | Monarch Bk. Co. v. Neil | U. S. C. C. | J. Grosscup, | Hamlin Copr. C. & D. 30 |
| Copies of copyrighted modifications of non-copyright pictures enjoined, 244 | ||||
| 1900 | Snow v. Laird | U. S. C. C. App. | J. Woods, | 98 F. R. 813 |
| Slight alteration on non-copyrighted photograph does not justify copyright, 245 | ||||
| 1900 | Walter v. Lane | House of Lords | [1900] A. C. 539 | |
| Reports of Rosebery’s speeches—no literary merit or labor need be shown to secure copyright, 68 | ||||
| 1900 | Falk v. Curtis Pub. Co. | U. S. C. C. | J. Dallas, | 100 F. R. 77 |
| “Person” includes partnerships and corporations, 273 | ||||
| 1901 | Falk v. Curtis Pub. Co. | U. S. C. C. App. | J. Buffington, | 107 F. R. 126 |
| Suit for penalties cannot precede forfeiture, 273.—Affirming Falk v. Curtis Pub. Co. | ||||
| 1901 | Child v. N. Y. Times Co. | U. S. C. C. | J. Hazel, | 110 F. R. 527 |
| No penalty where copies are not literally “found in possession,” 272 | ||||
| 1901 | Doan, et al. v. Amer. Bk. Co. | U. S. C. C. App. | J. Jenkins, | 105 F. R. 772 |
| Rebound second-hand copies no infringement, but must be distinctly marked, 263 | ||||
| 1901 | Marshall v. Bull | Ct. App. | L. J. Collins, | 85 L. T. 77 |
| Illustrations protected as part of book, 238; sale of electrotypes does not transfer copyright, 238 | ||||
| 1901 | Neufeld v. Chapman | King’s Bench | J. Walton, | Times O. 31, ’01 |
| “All copies sold” includes periodical publication, 448 | ||||
| 1901 | Nicholls v. Parker | King’s Bench | J. Wright, | 17 T. L. R. 482 |
| Specific license for use of illustration in specified periodical upheld, despite “custom of the trade,” 236 | ||||
| 1901 | Stern v. Rosey | D. C. C. App. | J. Shepard, | 17 App. Dist. Col. 562 |
| Mechanical reproduction of copyrighted songs not preventable, 205 | ||||
| 1901 | Trengrouse v. “Sol” Syndicate | Chancery | C. J. Alverstone, | Times S. 26, ’01 |
| Whole work infringement though less than a page pirated, 254 | ||||
| 1901 | Western Union v. Call Pub. Co. | U. S. Sup. Ct. | J. Brewer, | 181 U. S. 92 |
| When common law in states is in conflict, U. S. courts will enforce that of England, 44 | ||||
| 1901 | Hegeman v. Springer | U. S. C. C. App. | J. Wheeler, | 110 F. R. 374 |
| Seizure without prior demand authorized, 274 | ||||
| 1902 | Musical (summary proceedings) copyright act | 2 Edw. VII, c. 15 | ||
| 1902 | Amer. Press Assoc. v. Daily Story Pub. Co. | U. S. C. C. App. | J. Jenkins, | 120 F. R. 766 |
| Innocent copying from reprint lacking copyright notice an infringement, 253 | ||||
| 1902 | Britain v. Hanks | King’s Bench | J. Wright, | 86 L. T. 765 |
| Toy soldiers, artistically modeled, copyrightable as sculpture, 247 | ||||
| 1902 | Fraser v. Yack | U. S. C. C. App. | J. Jenkins, | 116 F. R. 285 |
| “Little Minister”—Foreigner, prior to 1891, could transfer advance sheets only, not right to copyright, 110 | ||||
| 1902 | Herne v. Liebler | N. Y. App. Div. | J. Ingraham, | 73 App. Div. 194 |
| Sub-license under limited lease of unpublished drama prevented under common law, 187 | ||||
| 1902 | Mifflin v. Dutton | U. S. Sup. Ct. | J. Brown, | 174 U. S. 82 |
| In joint authorship duplicate copyrights under different names not permissible, 102 | ||||
| 1902 | National Tel. News Co. v. Western Union | U. S. C. C. App. | J. Grosscup, | 119 F. R. 294 |
| News on ticker tape not copyrightable but unfair use enjoinable, 89 | ||||
| 1902 | Patterson v. Ogilvie | U. S. C. C. | J. Lacombe, | 119 F. R. 451 |
| Variance of sub-title immaterial, 192; damages not barred by limitation as penalties, 273 | ||||
| 1903 | Graves v. Gorrie | Privy Council | Ld. Lindley, | 89 L. T. 111 |
| Fine arts copyright act, 1862, does not protect outside United Kingdom, 246 | ||||
| 1903 | Hegeman v. Springer | U. S. Sup. Ct. | Per curiam, | 189 U. S. 505 |
| Affirming Hegeman v. Springer | ||||
| 1903 | Barnes v. Miner | U. S. C. C. | J. Ray, | 122 F. R. 480 |
| Combination of songs, costume and cinematograph not a dramatic composition, 175 | ||||
| 1903 | Bleistein v. Donaldson | U. S. Sup. Ct. | J. Holmes, | 188 U. S. 239 |
| Copyright can be entered in trading name instead of legal name, 102; circus posters protected—“A picture is none the less a subject of copyright that it is used for an advertisement,” 237 | ||||
| 1903 | Bloom v. Nixon | U. S. C. C. | J. McPherson, | 125 F. R. 977 |
| Parody, including quotation, not infringement, 190 | ||||
| 1903 | Champney v. Haag | U. S. C. C. | J. McPherson, | 121 F. R. 944 |
| Photograph from a photograph construed as infringement of photograph, and not of original painting, 243, 274 | ||||
| 1903 | Cleland v. Thayer | U. S. C. C. App. | J. Caldwell, | 121 F. R. 71 |
| Original photograph of uncopyrighted or uncopyrightable subject protected, 241 | ||||
| 1903 | Dodge v. Allied Arts | N. Y. Sup. Ct. | J. McCall, | Hamlin Copr. C. & D. 115 |
| Artist can prevent alterations of paintings done on commission, 245 | ||||
| 1903 | Edison v. Lubin | U. S. C. C. App. | J. Buffington, | 122 F. R. 240 |
| Entire moving picture film one photograph protected by single notice, 242 | ||||
| 1903 | Frohman v. Weber | N. Y. Sup. Ct. | J. Clarke, | Hamlin Copr. C. & D. 151 |
| Use of names of characters in plays not infringement, 192 | ||||
| 1903 | Kipling v. Putnam | U. S. C. C. App. | J. Coxe, | 120 F. R. 631 |
| Changed binding of copyright work permissible, 263; elephant’s head design not distinctive trade-mark, 263; no similarity to constitute unfair competition, 263 | ||||
| 1903 | Lawrence & Bullen v. Aflalo | House of Lords | [1904] L. R. App. C. 17 | |
| Proprietor of encyclopædia “stood in the shoes” of writers as copyright proprietor, 99 | ||||
| 1903 | Lorimer v. Boston Herald | Mass. Sup. Ct. | J. Morton, | Pub. Week. 63:1386 |
| Burlesqued title in newspaper articles not enjoinable, 264 | ||||
| 1903 | Moore v. Edwardes | King’s Bench | L. C. J. Alverstone, | Times Mr. 3, ’03 |
| Use of scenario from rejected ms. for unauthorised work punished, 176 | ||||
| 1903 | Nethersole v. Bell | Chancery | J. Farwell, | Times Jl. 4, 31, ’03 |
| Rival dramatisation as modified from other version enjoined, 174 | ||||
| 1903 | Rinehart v. Smith | U. S. C. C. | J. McPherson, | 121 F. R. 148 |
| Replevin not the proper form of copyright suit, 273 | ||||
| 1903 | Stone v. Long, | King’s Bench | Master Chitty, | Copr. Cas. ’01-’04, 66 |
| Publisher responsible for loss of ms. by employee’s negligence, 442 | ||||
| 1903 | Thompson Co. v. Amer. Law Book Co. | U. S. C. C. App. | J. Coxe, | 122 F. R. 922 |
| Use of list of cases, made from copyright digest, as guide to reports not infringement, 258; “equity will not protect a pirate from infringements of his piratical work,” 258 | ||||
| 1903 | Victor Talking Mach. Co. v. The Fair | U. S. C. C. App. | J. Baker, | 123 F. R. 424 |
| Patent as a monopoly, 50 | ||||
| 1903 | Wagner v. Conried | U. S. C. C. | J. Lacombe, | 125 F. R. 798 |
| Previous printing abroad forfeits American playright in music, 181 | ||||
| 1903 | Wright v. Eisle | N. Y. App. Div. | J. Woodward, | 86 App. Div. 356 |
| Filing of architectural plans in public office constitutes publication, 242 | ||||
| 1904 | U. S. act. Protection of works, Louisiana Purchase Exposition | |||
| 1904 | Bisel v. Welsh | U. S. C. C. | J. Holland, | 131 F. R. 564 |
| Repetition of errors evidence of author’s infringement of his own earlier work, 257 | ||||
| 1904 | Encyclopædia Brittanica Co. v. Tribune Assoc. | U. S. C. C. | J. Lacombe, | Pub. Week. 55:1458 |
| Condensations of copyright articles from cyclopædia enjoined, 261 | ||||
| 1904 | Gannet v. Rupert | U. S. C. C. App. | J. Coxe, | Pub. Week. 55:69 |
| “Comfort” as title of periodical protected as common law trade-mark, 84; court should arrest pirate before he makes off with plunder, 274 | ||||
| 1904 | Straus v. Amer. Pub. Assoc. | N. Y. Ct. App. | C. J. Parker, | 177 N. Y. 473 |
| Agreements to restrict prices legal on copyright books; contrary to statute on non-copyright books, 57 | ||||
| 1905 | U. S. act. Ad interim protection | |||
| 1905 | U. S. trade-mark act | |||
| 1905 | Fraser v. Edwardes | King’s Bench | J. Darling, | Times Mr. 23-30, ’05 |
| Use of scenario from rejected ms. for unauthorized work punished, 176 | ||||
| 1905 | Harper v. Donohue | U. S. C. C. | J. Sanborn, | 144 F. R. 491 |
| Analysis of author’s rights, 47; omission of notice on foreign-made edition does not vitiate Amer. copyright, 133 | ||||
| 1905 | Hills v. Hoover | U. S. C. C. | J. Holland, | 136 F. R. 701 |
| Additional words in copyright notice harmless superfluity, 128 | ||||
| 1905 | Lucas v. Moncrieff | Chancery | J. Warrington, | 21 T. L. R. 683 |
| Publishing agreement released by bankruptcy of publisher, 443 | ||||
| 1905 | Sampson & Murdock Co. v. Seaver Radford | U. S. C. C. App. | J. Putnam, | 140 F. R. 539 |
| Verification from rival directory beyond fair use, 255 | ||||
| 1905 | Slingsby v. Bradford Co. | Chancery | J. Warrington, | [1905] W. N. 122 |
| Copying of fraudulent material not punishable in equity, 258 | ||||
| 1906 | Musical copyright act | 6 Edw. VII; c. 36 | ||
| 1906 | U. S. trade-mark act | |||
| 1906 | Burk v. Johnson | U. S. C. C. App. | J. Adams, | 146 F. R. 209 |
| Copyright cannot protect schemes or method of doing business, 61 | ||||
| 1906 | Davis v. Benjamin | Chancery | J. Eady, | L. R. [1906] 2 Ch. 491 |
| Sheet of advertising illustrations held a book, 73 | ||||
| 1906 | Donohue v. Harper | U. S. C. C. App. | Per curiam, | 146 F. R. 1023 |
| Affirming decision in Harper v. Donohue | ||||
| 1906 | Hartford Printing Co. v. Hartford Directory Co. | U. S. C. C. | J. Platt, | 146 F. R. 332; 148 F. R. 470 |
| Gross receipts less cost awarded as damages, for wholesale copying, 275 | ||||
| 1906 | Macmillan v. Dent | Ct. App. | J. Vaughan, | [1907] 1 Ch. 107 |
| Charles Lamb letters—copyright separate from material object, 92 | ||||
| 1906 | Rex v. Willets | Com. Serj., | Times Ja. 20, ’06 | |
| Criminal sentences in conspiracy of cheap music pirates, 277 | ||||
| 1906 | Ward, Lock & Co. v. Long | Chancery | J. Kekewich, | L. R. [1906] 2 Ch. 550 |
| Agreement to write a book assignable after completion of book, 441 | ||||
| 1906 | White-Smith v. Apollo | U. S. C. C. App. | Per curiam, | 147 F. R. 226 |
| Perforated roll not copy in fact of staff notation, 204 | ||||
| 1906 | Wooster v. Crane | U. S. C. C. App. | J. Van Devanter, | 147 F. R. 515 |
| Author restrained from selling modification of copyright work previously assigned, 442 | ||||
| 1907 | Patents and designs act | 7 Edw. VII. c. 29 | ||
| 1907 | American Tobacco Co. v. Werckmeister | U. S. Sup. Ct. | J. Day, | 207 U. S. 284 |
| Exhibition with restriction as to copying, not publication, 232, 235 | ||||
| 1907 | Bracken v. Rosenthal | U. S. C. C. | J. Kohlsaat, | 151 F. R. 136 |
| Photograph infringes copyright in statuary, 243 | ||||
| 1907 | Dutton v. Cupples & Leon | N. Y. App. Div. | J. Scott, | Pub. Week. 71:630 |
| Imitation of style of series unfair competition, 263 | ||||
| 1907 | Jude’s “Liedertafel” case | Ct. App. | C. J. Alverstone, | L. R. [1907] 1 Ch. 651 |
| Assignment expunged from record, 447 | ||||
| 1907 | Philip v. Pennell | Chancery | J. Kekewich, | L. R. [1907] 2 Ch. 577 |
| Publication permitted of biographical information from receivers of letters, 92 | ||||
| 1907 | Merriam v. Ogilvie | U. S. C. C. | J. Colt, | 149 F. R. 858 |
| Use of name “Webster” not restrainable except where public is misled, 261 | ||||
| 1908 | Merriam v. Ogilvie | U. S. C. C. App. | J. Aldrich, | 159 F. R. 638 |
| Affirming Merriam v. Ogilvie | ||||
| 1908 | White-Smith v. Apollo | U. S. Sup. Ct. | J. Day, | 209 U. S. 1 |
| Records not copies or publications of copyright music, 54, 204. Affirming White-Smith v. Apollo | ||||
| 1908 | Bamforth v. Douglas Post Card Co. | U. S. C. C. | J. McPherson, | 158 F. R. 355 |
| Unfair competition not restrainable if copyrightable work is not copyrighted, 264 | ||||
| 1908 | Bobbs-Merrill Co. v. Straus | U. S. Sup. Ct. | J. Day, | 210 U. S. 339 |
| Restriction of price not enforceable in connection with copyright notice, 55, 57 | ||||
| 1908 | Clinical Obstetrics, in re | Chancery | J. Warrington, | Copr. Cas. ’05-’10, 176 |
| “Exclusive right of publication” a license, not assignment, 447; assignment record expunged, 447. | ||||
| 1908 | Globe Newspaper Co. v. Walker | U. S. Sup. Ct. | J. Day, | 210 U. S. 356 |
| No damages outside statutory protection where no copies were found in possession, 27 | ||||
| 1908 | Jones v. Amer. Law Bk. Co. | N. Y. App. Div. | J. Houghton, | 125 App. Div. 519 |
| Denying right of author to have name appended to cyclopædic contribution, 100 | ||||
| 1908 | Karno v. Pathé Frères | King’s Bench | J. Jelf, | 99 L. T. 114 |
| Moving pictures not infringement, 177 | ||||
| 1908 | Landa v. Greenberg | Chancery | J. Eve, | 24 T. L. R. 441 |
| Nom de plume of settled use protected outside copyright or trade-mark, 99 | ||||
| 1908 | Mansell v. Valley Printing Co. | Ct. App. | Cozens-Hardy, M. R., | L. R. [1908] 2 Ch. 441 |
| Common law concurrent with statutory protection of unpublished works, 61 | ||||
| 1908 | Royal Sales Co. v. Gaynor | U. S. C. C. | J. Ward, | 164 F. R. 207 |
| Monogram not copyrightable, 70 | ||||
| 1908 | Sarpy v. Holland | Ct. App. | Cozens-Hardy, M. R., | L. R. [1908] 2 Ch. 198 |
| Copyright reservation in foreign language sufficing, 313; no formalities requisite under international copyright, 313 | ||||
| 1908 | Scribner v. Straus | U. S. Sup. Ct. | J. Day, | 210 U. S. 352 |
| Agreement to restrict prices not proven by notice on bills, etc., 55 | ||||
| 1908 | Share Certificate Book, in re | Div. Ct. | J. Bigham, | Copr. Cas. ’05-’10, 173 |
| False entry expunged from registry, 150 | ||||
| 1908 | Straus v. American Publishers’ Association | N. Y. App. Div. | J. Gray, | 127 App. D. 936 |
| Agreements to restrict price legal on copyright books, 57; dissenting opinion, 57 | ||||
| 1908 | Tate v. Fullbrook | Ct. App. | L. J. Vaughan Williams, | L. R. [1908] 1 K. B. 821 |
| Writer of dialogue sole author of musical sketch in England, 176 | ||||
| 1908 | United Dictionary Co. v. Merriam | U. S. Sup. Ct. | J. Holmes, | 208 U. S. 260 |
| Omission of notice on foreign-made edition sold only for use there does not vitiate Amer. copyright, 134 | ||||
| 1908 | Dam v. Kirke La Shelle Co. | U. S. C. C. | J. Hazel, | 166 F. R. 589 |
| Reassignment to author of copyright in periodical contribution, 101; right of dramatization included in copyright of story, 171; full profits awarded as damages, 171 | ||||
| 1908 | Harper v. Kalem | U. S. C. C. | J. Lacombe, | |
| Copyright notice in book protects illustrations against moving picture reproduction, 77 | ||||
| 1909 | U. S. Copyright code | |||
| 1909 | Banks Law Pub. Co. v. Lawyers Co-operative Pub. Co. | U. S. C. C. App. | Per curiam, | 169 F. R. 386 |
| Affirming that arrangement of cases in sequence, pagination, etc., are not protectable details, 259 | ||||
| 1909 | Bong v. Campbell Art Co. | U. S. Sup. Ct. | J. McKenna, | 214 U. S. 236 |
| Citizen of an unproclaimed country cannot indirectly obtain American copyright, 110 | ||||
| 1909 | Bosselman v. Richardson | U. S. C. C. App. | J. Ward, | 174 F. R. 622 |
| Copyright claimant other than author must prove his claims, 107 | ||||
| 1909 | Caliga v. Inter-Ocean Newsp. Co. | U. S. Sup. Ct. | J. Day, | 215 U. S. 182 |
| Re-copyright on finishing picture invalid, 231 | ||||
| 1909 | Chicago Tribune v. Ill. Printing & Pub. Co. | U. S. C. C. | J. Grosscup, | Pub. Week. 76: 643, 957 |
| Peary letters—copyright in newspaper letter as book upheld, 103 | ||||
| 1909 | N. Y. Times v. Press Pub. Co. et al. | U. S. C. C. | J. Hand, | Pub. Week. 76: 643, 957 |
| Peary letters—agreement for newspaper letters did not authorize copyright as book, 103 | ||||
| 1909 | Consolidated Gas Co. | U. S. Sup. Ct. | J. Peckham, | 212 U. S. 19 |
| State has sovereign power to limit prices—in case of public franchise corporation, 207 | ||||
| 1909 | Freeman v. Trade Register | U. S. C. C. | J. Donworth, | 173 F. R. 419 |
| Copyright notice on editorial page invalid, 131 | ||||
| 1909 | Frohman v. Ferris | Ill. Sup. Ct. | J. Farmer, | 238 Ill. Rep. 430 |
| Performance of play not publication, 181 | ||||
| 1909 | Glaser v. St. Elmo Co. | U. S. C. C. | J. Holt, | 175 F. R. 276 |
| Title of novel, out of copyright, not protectable in drama, 192 | ||||
| 1909 | Green v. Luby | U. S. C. C. | J. Noyes, | 177 F. R. 287 |
| Error in classification does not invalidate copyright, 136 | ||||
| 1909 | Harper v. Kalem | U. S. C. C. App. | J. Ward, | 169 F. R. 61 |
| Moving pictures may infringe book copyright, 176, 242; both speech and action not necessary in dramatic performances, 176; illustrations as such do not infringe book copyright, 237 | ||||
| 1909 | Heinemann v. Smart Set Pub. Co. | Chancery | J. Parker, | Times, Jl. 15, ’09 |
| Innocent publisher responsible for acts beyond authority given to literary agent, 437 | ||||
| 1909 | Hervieu v. Ogilvie | U. S. C. C. | J. Martin, | 169 F. R. 978 |
| Printed drama not subject to manufacturing provisions as “book,” 155, 168 | ||||
| 1909 | Hunter v. Clifford | West. Co. Ct. | J. Lush, | Times N. 12. ’09 |
| Right to copyright lapsed on work of art sold without registration, 247 | ||||
| 1909 | Karno v. Pathé Frères | Ct. App. | L. J. Vaughan Williams, | 100 L. T. 260 |
| Exhibitor, not manufacturer of film, responsible party, 177 | ||||
| 1909 | Saake v. Lederer | U. S. C. C. App. | J. Buffington, | 174 F. R. 135 |
| License to perform does not imply authority to copyright, 107 | ||||
| 1909 | Scholz v. Amasis | Ct. App. | L. C. J. Farwell, | Times My. 19, ’09 |
| Only substantial copying of written dialogue infringes drama in England, 176 | ||||
| 1910 | Dam v. Kirke La Shelle Co. | U. S. C. C. App. | J. Noyes, | 175 F. R. 902 |
| Following decision in lower court | ||||
| 1910 | De Jonge v. Breuker & Kessler | U. S. C. C. | J. McPherson, | 182 F. R. 150 |
| Artistic designs for cover paper copyrightable, 237; separable designs must have separate copyright notices, 242; subject cannot be protected both under copyright and trade-mark acts, 237 | ||||
| 1910 | Eliot & Collier v. Jones, et al. | N. Y. Sup. Ct. | J. Newburger, | 120 N. Y. Supp. 989 |
| Use of “Dr. Eliot’s five-foot shelf” prohibited as involving deception, 85 | ||||
| 1910 | Ellis v. Hurst | N. Y. Sup. Ct. | J. Greenbaum, | 128 N. Y. Supp. 144 |
| Use of an author’s real name on pseudonymous non-copyright works not restrainable, 98 | ||||
| 1910 | Gilbert v. Workman | Chancery | J. Neville, | Times Ja. 19, ’10 |
| Interpolation of song without consent of author of opera enjoined, 100 | ||||
| 1910 | Hein v. Harris | U. S. C. C. | J. Hand, | 175 F. R. 875 |
| Musical copyright infringed by transposition, 170 Affirmed in same year by U. S. C. C. App. | ||||
| 1910 | Larby v. Love | King’s Bench | J. Bucknill, | Copr. Cas. ’05-’10, 291 |
| Upholds prohibition against underselling in bill of sale, 57 | ||||
| 1910 | Monckton v. Gramophone Co. | Chancery | J. Joyce, | Times D. 6, ’10 |
| Common law cannot protect after publication, 62 | ||||
| 1910 | Park & Pollard v. Kellerstrass | U. S. C. C. | J. Philips, | 181 F. R. 431 |
| Whole work enjoined where infringing parts were inseparable, 258 | ||||
| 1910 | Press Assoc. v. Reporting Agency | Chancery | J. Warrington, | Times D. 8, ’10 |
| Election returns protected against “unfair competition,” 89 | ||||
| 1910 | Record & Guide Co. v. Bromley | U. S. C. C. | J. McPherson, | 175 F. R. 156 |
| Omission of date vitiates copyright notice though given on same page, 128; substitution of name in copyright notice without authority of law voids copyright, 136 | ||||
| 1910 | Rex v. Bokenham | Cent. Crim. Ct. | Com. Serj., | Times Jl. 22, ’10 |
| Piracy from surreptitiously obtained copies of poems punished by imprisonment, 277 | ||||
| 1910 | Stern v. Remick | U. S. C. C. | J. Hand, | 175 F. R. 282 |
| Sale of single copy held to constitute publication, 127; use of Roman for Arabic numerals in copyright notice immaterial, 130 | ||||
| 1910 | West Pub. Co. v. Thompson Co. | U. S. C. C. App. | J. Ward, | 176 F. R. 833 |
| One copyright notice suffices to cover earlier copyrights of parts, 132; list made to run down cases permissible, but extensive copying from digest an infringement, 259 | ||||
| 1910 | White-Smith v. Goff | U. S. C. C. | J. Brown, | 180 F. R. 256 |
| Renewal personal to author or heirs only, except possibly in case of work assigned before publication, 116 | ||||
| 1911 | Copyright act | 1 & 2 Geo. V c. 46 | ||
| 1911 | Shepard v. Taylor | U. S. C. C. | J. Hazel, | 185 F. R. 941 |
| Common errors prima facie proof of infringement, 258 | ||||
| 1911 | White v. Bender | U. S. C. C. | J. Ray, | 185 F. R. 921 |
| Citations may be utilized for verification, but bodily transfer is infringement, 257 | ||||
Leading references are in black face figures. References to statutes are designated by § (without prefix referring to the American code, with preceding E referring to the new British code, C to Canadian measure and Au. to Australian code), International Copyright Union conventions by I, and Pan American conventions by P; those to U. S. Copyright Office Rules and Regulations are preceded by R. The page numeration also indicates character of reference, pp. 1-41 covering historical portion; pp. 42-310, specific subject chapters, chiefly American and British; pp. 311-372, international copyright; pp. 373-429, copyright in other countries; pp. 430-462, business relations and literature. Law cases are followed by date, serving as reference to chronological table.